2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.03.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructure quantification of turbostratic carbon by HRTEM image analysis: State of the art, biases, sensitivity and best practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicates a 73.9% reduction from 414 nm as measured in the SEM image of PNF. (Figure S3) From the HRTEM images of Figure 1D,E, the d‐spacing of CNF was determined to be 0.37 nm and 0.42 nm, which identifies turbostratic type carbon 38 . In Raman spectra (Figure S4), two peaks at 1320 and 1558 cm −1 representing D and G bands of carbon materials, respectively, indicate that PNF was successfully transformed into partially graphitic carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result indicates a 73.9% reduction from 414 nm as measured in the SEM image of PNF. (Figure S3) From the HRTEM images of Figure 1D,E, the d‐spacing of CNF was determined to be 0.37 nm and 0.42 nm, which identifies turbostratic type carbon 38 . In Raman spectra (Figure S4), two peaks at 1320 and 1558 cm −1 representing D and G bands of carbon materials, respectively, indicate that PNF was successfully transformed into partially graphitic carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(Figure S3) From the HRTEM images of Figure 1D,E, the d-spacing of CNF was determined to be 0.37 nm and 0.42 nm, which identifies turbostratic type carbon. 38 In Raman spectra (Figure S4), two peaks at 1320 and 1558 cm À1 representing D and G bands of carbon materials, respectively, indicate that PNF was successfully transformed into partially graphitic carbon. As shown in Figure 1F, SAED ring patterns of CNF also support the partial graphitization, which is consistent with HRTEM and Raman results.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 2a−c, it has been clearly observed that the PTG sample consists of thin sheets with a thickness of around a few nm and the nature of these PTG samples matches the reported results. 36,37 These thin sheets are quickly separable under sonication, and single ultrathin mesoporous graphene sheets are visible under the TEM analysis (Figure 2a). The high magnification TEM image reveals that the ultrathin graphene sheets have lots of porosity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57] Especially for nanocarbons containing narrow micropores below 1 nm, a complete pore size range can only be extracted using dedicated models, e.g., nonlocal-density functional theory (NLDFT) and quenched solid density functional theory (QSDFT). We also stress the potential of coupling advanced gas adsorption techniques with other complementary characterization methods for accurately mapping the pore texture of activated carbon materials, [61] such as mercury porosimetry, [62] high-resolution electron microscopy, [63][64][65] small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), [18] and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based methods. [50,66,67]…”
Section: Porous Texturementioning
confidence: 99%