2016
DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2016.1202235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanotechnology applied to treatment of mucopolysaccharidoses

Abstract: Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are genetic disorders caused by the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans due to deficiencies in the lysosomal enzymes responsible for their catabolism. Current treatments are not fully effective and are not available for all MPS types. Accordingly, researchers have tested novel therapies for MPS, including nanotechnology-based enzyme delivery systems and gene therapy. In this review, we aim to analyze some of the approaches involving nanotechnology as alternative treatments for MPS. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although non-viral vectors are very safe, due to their episomal conformation and very low immunogenicity, their main drawback is the low transfection efficiency. Many strategies have been developed to enhance non-viral gene delivery (Wang et al , 2013; Jayant et al , 2016), as electroporation, gene gun, hydrodynamic injection, nanotechnology-based carriers (Schuh et al , 2016), DNA minicircle (Osborn et al , 2011), and transposons (Aronovich et al , 2009), but all still present low efficiency of transfection and specific procedure limitations.…”
Section: Gene Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although non-viral vectors are very safe, due to their episomal conformation and very low immunogenicity, their main drawback is the low transfection efficiency. Many strategies have been developed to enhance non-viral gene delivery (Wang et al , 2013; Jayant et al , 2016), as electroporation, gene gun, hydrodynamic injection, nanotechnology-based carriers (Schuh et al , 2016), DNA minicircle (Osborn et al , 2011), and transposons (Aronovich et al , 2009), but all still present low efficiency of transfection and specific procedure limitations.…”
Section: Gene Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was an improvement in neurocognitive progression compared with the natural history of MPS III, although a longer follow-up was envisaged to assess safety outcomes and persistency of improved cognitive development [ 77 ]. Additional promising approaches for the treatment of CNS disease in MPS include enzyme-fusion protein technology (Trojan horse strategy), substrate reduction therapy, chaperone molecules, and the use of nanoparticle-delivered therapy [ 16 , 78 , 79 ] (see also the reviews by Fecarotta et al [ 80 ] and Fraldi et al [ 81 ] in this Supplement). In addition to the treatment of primary CNS disease, children with MPS benefit from adjunctive therapies such as speech/language therapy, and occupational and physical therapy.…”
Section: Principles Of Treatment Of Neuronopathic Mpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,[16][17][18][19] A quick diagnosis is essential because the therapeutics are effective only in patients under 2.5 years of age. 3,[20][21][22] Progress in MPS treatment has occurred throughout the world. However, in low-and middle-income countries, it is difficult to have a definitive diagnosis of one of the MPSs due to lacking enzyme assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%