2011
DOI: 10.5640/insc.0104169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanotechnology for Alzheimer’s disease detection and treatment

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper, we present the role of nanotechnology in the development and improvement of techniques for early diagnosis and effective treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Since AD pathology is almost irreversible and present-day medications for AD only lower its associated symptoms, application of disease-modifying treatments could be successful only if AD early diagnosis is possible. The nanodiagnostic methods reported and compared in this paper include both of in vitro and in vivo nature. Of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to BN theory, if we assume a directed graph G with N nodes, each node n ∈ N has a number of paternal nodes pa(n) that may be linked with “child” nodes and the joint distribution for such a network given as follows: leftPfalse(Nfalse)=nNpfalse(n|pafalse(nfalse)false). By taking into consideration the latest calculations for the relative probabilities of AD progression due to certain brain lesions (Table 2) (Christen, 2000; de la Torre, 2002; Praticò et al, 2002; Modrego and Ferrández, 2004; Hooper et al, 2007; Cheung et al, 2008; Stone, 2008; Schuff et al, 2009; Snider et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2009; Israeli-Korn et al, 2010; Barnes and Yaffe, 2011; Nazem and Mansoori, 2011; Serrano-Pozo et al, 2011; Bird, 2012; Alzheimer's Association, 2015; Chakrabarty et al, 2015) and the majority of the published AD biomarkers (Albert et al, 2010, 2011; Besson et al, 2015; Cabezas-Opazo et al, 2015; Dong et al, 2015; Duce et al, 2015; Eskildsen et al, 2015; Jansen et al, 2015; Madeira et al, 2015; Michel, 2015; Nakanishi et al, 2015; Ossenkoppele et al, 2015; Østergaard et al, 2015; Quiroz et al, 2015; Ringman et al, 2015; Risacher et al, 2015; Sastre et al, 2015; Schindler and Fagan, 2015; Sutphen et al, 2015; Thordardottir et al, 2015; Cauwenberghe et al, 2016; Counts et al, 2016; Gaël et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2016) or calculating indirectly the relative probabilities, we designed a Bayesian model for the prediction of AD based on the abnormal testing of one or more biomarkers. The described probabilities were exported through major clinical trials globally and are continuously subject to updating and redefinition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to BN theory, if we assume a directed graph G with N nodes, each node n ∈ N has a number of paternal nodes pa(n) that may be linked with “child” nodes and the joint distribution for such a network given as follows: leftPfalse(Nfalse)=nNpfalse(n|pafalse(nfalse)false). By taking into consideration the latest calculations for the relative probabilities of AD progression due to certain brain lesions (Table 2) (Christen, 2000; de la Torre, 2002; Praticò et al, 2002; Modrego and Ferrández, 2004; Hooper et al, 2007; Cheung et al, 2008; Stone, 2008; Schuff et al, 2009; Snider et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2009; Israeli-Korn et al, 2010; Barnes and Yaffe, 2011; Nazem and Mansoori, 2011; Serrano-Pozo et al, 2011; Bird, 2012; Alzheimer's Association, 2015; Chakrabarty et al, 2015) and the majority of the published AD biomarkers (Albert et al, 2010, 2011; Besson et al, 2015; Cabezas-Opazo et al, 2015; Dong et al, 2015; Duce et al, 2015; Eskildsen et al, 2015; Jansen et al, 2015; Madeira et al, 2015; Michel, 2015; Nakanishi et al, 2015; Ossenkoppele et al, 2015; Østergaard et al, 2015; Quiroz et al, 2015; Ringman et al, 2015; Risacher et al, 2015; Sastre et al, 2015; Schindler and Fagan, 2015; Sutphen et al, 2015; Thordardottir et al, 2015; Cauwenberghe et al, 2016; Counts et al, 2016; Gaël et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2016) or calculating indirectly the relative probabilities, we designed a Bayesian model for the prediction of AD based on the abnormal testing of one or more biomarkers. The described probabilities were exported through major clinical trials globally and are continuously subject to updating and redefinition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CdSe nanoparticles may thus access the human body either through injured tissue or through various exposure routes such as inhalation and dermal contact (2, 3). CdSe quantum dots are currently under investigation for potential application in various fields, amongst them are the following: (i) diagnosis and treatment of diseases, such as cancer and Alzheimer's (4, 5); and (ii) drug delivery (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly potent signal transduction can be achieved with nanotechnology that may help in early diagnosis of AD. This potential application of nanotechnology in imaging/detection is primarily based on the physical (magnetic, optical, or electrical), chemical and/or biological quality of smartly designed nanoparticles [20]. Conventionally, the soluble bio-markers of AD can be detected by two general approaches.…”
Section: Nanotechnology Based Theranostics In Admentioning
confidence: 99%