2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-873x.00220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrative Inquiry: Toward Understanding Life’s Artistry

Abstract: As we entered into Eisner and Powell's exploration of the artistic and aesthetic qualities of the work of researchers, we were drawn toward deeper questions of our own lives as narrative inquirers. In particular, we thought about a metaphorical three-dimensional narrative inquiry space as a way to explore the aesthetic and artistic dimensions of experience. By returning to field texts of our recent work alongside Darlene, a mother we met on the landscape of an inner-city school context, we show how she was eng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conceptual framework of narrative inquiry described by Clandinin and Connelly () was used to analyze the data. This metaphorical framework describes three dimensions of narrative inquiry space including: (i) Temporality : moving backward and forward between past, present, and future (Clandinin & Huber, ); (ii) Personal and social dimension : this dimension points inward and outward – inward toward “feelings, hopes, reactions” and outward toward “existential conditions” (Clandinin & Huber, ); and (iii) Place : the specific concrete physical boundaries of the “inquiry landscapes” (Clandinin & Connelly, ) where the inquiry and events take place (Clandinin et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual framework of narrative inquiry described by Clandinin and Connelly () was used to analyze the data. This metaphorical framework describes three dimensions of narrative inquiry space including: (i) Temporality : moving backward and forward between past, present, and future (Clandinin & Huber, ); (ii) Personal and social dimension : this dimension points inward and outward – inward toward “feelings, hopes, reactions” and outward toward “existential conditions” (Clandinin & Huber, ); and (iii) Place : the specific concrete physical boundaries of the “inquiry landscapes” (Clandinin & Connelly, ) where the inquiry and events take place (Clandinin et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As literacy researchers versed in CRT, we all had some experience and interest in the study of lived experiences (Connelly & Clandinin, 2000) and how artifacts developed from these experiences become both the content and method of investigation (Clandinin & Huber, 2002). As literacy researchers versed in CRT, we all had some experience and interest in the study of lived experiences (Connelly & Clandinin, 2000) and how artifacts developed from these experiences become both the content and method of investigation (Clandinin & Huber, 2002).…”
Section: Methods I: From Coi To Copmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, a translation becomes a new work of art in its own right, which may be virtually on par with the original, even though it cannot substitute for it. However, in yet other cases, any translation (whether by the author or others) turns an authentic work of creative scholarship into a caricature of itself (Andersen 2004;Bagley 2008;Clandinin and Huber 2002;Dewey 1934;Mallard 2009;Barone and Eisner 2006;Bredo 2006).…”
Section: "Translation" and The No-peer Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%