2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrative psychological content analysis as a tool for psychological status monitoring of crews in isolated, confined and extreme settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most crews carry out two-to three-week missions under the constraints of a simulated Mars mission 1 http://mdrs.marssociety.org/. Several missions have examined crew function and performance from a variety of perspectives, e.g., psychological support [29,30], challenging workloads [31,32], and team composition [33]. These missions aimed to explore different ways to support crew psychological health in prolonged space missions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most crews carry out two-to three-week missions under the constraints of a simulated Mars mission 1 http://mdrs.marssociety.org/. Several missions have examined crew function and performance from a variety of perspectives, e.g., psychological support [29,30], challenging workloads [31,32], and team composition [33]. These missions aimed to explore different ways to support crew psychological health in prolonged space missions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathologically high self-reference may indicate possessiveness, the dominance of one's existence, and narcissistic tendencies, while pathologically low self-reference may indicate depersonalization [54]. In contrast, we-reference in psychological terms refers to belonging to a community of experience and has been studied in terms of group cohesion and identification with a group [55].…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual attributes researched in SAE include cultural differences, personality and degree and type of training. Several studies have described how individual differences impact how team members differentially respond to the stressors of SAE (Ehmann et al, 2011;Tafforin, 2015). Expanding on these findings are studies explaining the TPM 28,3/4 effect of personality and individual coping mechanisms on team cohesion and psychological well-being (Kahn and Leon, 2000;Rosnet et al, 1998).…”
Section: Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%