Narratives of neoliberalism: ‘clinical labour’ in context

Abstract

Cross-border reproductive care has been thrust under the international spotlight by a series of recent scandals. These have prompted calls to develop more robust means of assessing the exploitative potential of such practices and the need for overarching and normative forms of national and international regulation. Allied theorisations of the emergence of forms of clinical labour have cast the outsourcing of reproductive services such as gamete donation and gestational surrogacy as artefacts of a wider neoliberalisation of service provision. These accounts share with many other narratives of neoliberalism a number of key assertions that relate to the presumed organisation of labour relations within this paradigm. This article critically engages with four assumptions implicit in these accounts: that clinical labourers constitute a largely homogeneous underclass of workers; that reproductive labour has been contractualised in ways that disembed it from wider social and communal relations; that contractualisation can provide protection for clinical labour lessening the need for formal regulatory oversight; and that the transnationalisation of reproductive service labour is largely unidirectional and characterised by a dynamic of provision in which ‘the rest’ services ‘the West’. Drawing on the first findings of a large-scale ethnographic research project into assisted reproduction in India I provide evidence to refute these assertions. In so doing the article demonstrates that while the outsourcing and contractualisation of reproductive labour may be embedded in a wider neoliberal paradigm these practices cannot be understood nor their impacts be fully assessed in isolation from their social and cultural contexts.

Cleansing public nature: landscapes of homelessness, health, and displacement

“…Critical research has sufficiently demonstrated that neoliberal transformations result in numerous health implications, ranging from public policy to the commodification of the human body (Parry 2015), but experiences of the Hillside residents place political ecologies of health within a particular landscape in a particular political economic moment. At the same time, the ethnographic experiences articulated here speak to larger phenomena operating at global scales.…”

From biopolitics to bioeconomies: The ART of (re-)producing white futures in Mexico's surrogacy market

“…Comparing the reproductive labor of oocyte donors and surrogates shows that the reproductive material of egg donors is differently valued and rewarded than the gestational services of surrogate mothers (Parry 2015c). Egg donors are rewarded on the basis of their physical appearance; the value given to their body is linked to post-colonial imaginaries of white beauty.…”

Surrogacy: blessing or curse to poor society in India

“…Indian courts are still grappling with the issues involved in surrogacy. 9 The essential elements of surrogacy are childbearing by a surrogate mother, the termination of her parental rights after his birth, and payment of money by the genetic parents. If the money paid is merely to recompense the surrogate for the pain undertaken and includes reimbursement of medical and other expenses, then it is non-commercial surrogacy.…”