2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrow-band imaging for scar (NBI-SCAR) classification: from conception to multicenter validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NPV for high confidence predictions with HD-WLE was 98.1 % (95 %CI 94.7 %-99.4 %), HD-WLE with near focus was 98.8 % (95 %CI 95.6 %-99.7 %), NBI was 98.8 % (95 %CI 95.6 %-99.7 %), and NBI with near focus was 100 % (95 %CI 97.8 %-100 %) [7]. A further study (NBI-SCAR) developed and validated an NBI classification for RRA using videos rated by endoscopists with varying levels of experience (trainees and experts) [8]. The NPV for high confidence predictions using this system was 100 % (95 %CI 96.1 %-100 %), although it has not been validated in a clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NPV for high confidence predictions with HD-WLE was 98.1 % (95 %CI 94.7 %-99.4 %), HD-WLE with near focus was 98.8 % (95 %CI 95.6 %-99.7 %), NBI was 98.8 % (95 %CI 95.6 %-99.7 %), and NBI with near focus was 100 % (95 %CI 97.8 %-100 %) [7]. A further study (NBI-SCAR) developed and validated an NBI classification for RRA using videos rated by endoscopists with varying levels of experience (trainees and experts) [8]. The NPV for high confidence predictions using this system was 100 % (95 %CI 96.1 %-100 %), although it has not been validated in a clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the results suggested high sensitivity and accuracy, no official classification was raised. Therefore, some researchers developed the narrow-band imaging for scar (NBI-SCAR) classification in 2020 ( 142 ). By evacuating the scar with NBI, they described the key characteristics of both recurrent and non-recurrent disease.…”
Section: Scarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have provided new evidence on the efficacy of advanced endoscopic imaging in the detection of residual or recurrent lesions in post-EMR scars [9][10][11][12]. A prospective single-center study, which analyzed 183 scars using systematic narrow-band imaging (NBI) after WLE, showed significantly higher sensitivity and negative predictive values (NPVs) for detection of endoscopic residual neoplasia in a combination of WLE plus NBI vs. WLE alone (93.3 % vs. 66.7 % and 98.6 % vs. 93.6 %, respectively) [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NBI sensitivity was significantly higher compared with WLE (100 % vs. 73.7 %; P < 0.05). The authors concluded that NBI evaluation had a high sensitivity and NPV for exclusion of recurrence when used by endoscopists who were experienced in colonoscopy and NBI [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation