Background and aims: Current guidelines suggest that routine biopsy of post-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) scars can be abandoned, provided that a standardized imaging protocol with virtual chromoendoscopy is used. However, few studies have examined the accuracy of advanced endoscopic imaging, such as Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) versus White Light Endoscopy (WLE) to predict histological recurrence. We aimed to assess whether NBI accuracy is superior to WLE and whether one or both techniques can replace biopsies.
Patients and methods: Multicentre, randomized, patient-blinded, crossover trial, with consecutive patients undergoing the first colonoscopy after EMR of lesions ≥20mm. Computer-generated randomization and opaque envelope concealed allocation. Patients were randomly assigned to scar examination with NBI followed by WLE (NBI+WLE), or WLE followed by NBI (WLE+NBI). Histology was the reference method, with biopsies being performed in all tissues, either or not showing recurrence.
Results: The study included 203 scars, 103 in group NBI+WLE and 100 in group WLE+NBI. Recurrence was confirmed histologically in 29.6% of the scars. The diagnostic accuracy of NBI was not statistically different from WLE 95% (95%CI, 92%-98%) vs. 94% (95%CI, 90%-97%); P=0.48). When assessing NBI vs. WLE, the negative predictive values were (NPV) 96% (95% CI, 93%-99%) vs. 93% (95% CI, 89%-97%), not reaching statistically significance (P=0.06).
Conclusions: The accuracy of NBI for the diagnosis of recurrence was not superior to that of WLE. Endoscopic assessment of EMR scars with WLE and NBI achieved a NPV that precludes routine biopsy in cases of negative optical diagnosis.