Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cruz, Raimundo Leite; Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo; Batista, Victor Eduardo Souza; Yogui, Fernanda Costa; Oliveira, Hiskell Francine Fernandes e; Verri, Fellippo Ramos

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.10.001

Cited by 22 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By using implants with a reduced diameter, the risk of bone dehiscence and fenestration can be reduced and bone augmentation might be avoided. Therefore, narrow diameter implants present an alternative in the anterior region as they showed comparable results in terms of survival and complication rates, as well as marginal bone loss compared to regular diameter implants [ 26 , 27 ]. However, data on the mechanical reliability of narrow diameter implants made of zirconia are sparse [ 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Zirconia-Based Composite Presents an Aging Resistant Material for Narrow-Diameter Ceramic Implants

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A novel ceria-stabilized zirconia-alumina-aluminate composite (Ce-TZP-comp) that is not prone to aging presents a potential alternative to yttrium-stabilized zirconia for ceramic oral implants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of a one-piece narrow-diameter implant made of Ce-TZP-comp. Implant prototypes with a narrow (3.4 mm) and regular (4.0 mm) diameter were embedded according to ISO 14801, and subgroups (n = 8) were subsequently exposed to dynamic loading (107 cycles, 98N) and/or hydrothermal treatment (aging, 85 °C). Loading/aging was only applied as a combined protocol for the 4.0 mm diameter implants. One subgroup of each diameter remained untreated. One sample was cross-sectioned from each subgroup and evaluated with a scanning electron microscope for phase-transformation of the lattice. Finally, the remaining samples were loaded to fracture. A multivariate linear regression model was applied for statistical analyses (significance at p < 0.05). All samples withstood the different loading/aging protocols and no transformation propagation was observed. The narrow diameter implants showed the lowest fracture load after combined loading/aging (628 ± 56 N; p < 0.01), whereas all other subgroups exhibited no significantly reduced fracture resistance (between 762 ± 62 and 806 ± 73 N; p > 0.05). Therefore, fracture load values of Ce-TZP-comp implants suggest a reliable intraoral clinical application in the anterior jaw regions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Zirconia-Based Composite Presents an Aging Resistant Material for Narrow-Diameter Ceramic Implants

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Narrow implants are an excellent alternative for fixed rehabilitation of areas with reduced bone volume, without grafting procedures. Although the literature is not clear about the definition of narrow implants, a systematic review that included implants with diameters smaller than 3.75 mm showed that their survival rates, complications, and bone loss seemed to be no different from those reported for regular diameter implants 15 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Although the literature is not clear about the definition of narrow implants, a systematic review that included implants with diameters smaller than 3.75 mm showed that their survival rates, complications, and bone loss seemed to be no different from those reported for regular diameter implants. 15 In this present case, the patient needed to rehabilitate two agenesic maxillary lateral incisors, and since there was reduced buccolingual bone volume as well as mesiodistal space, hybrid morse tapper connection extra-narrow implants (Helix Narrow GM, Neodent,) were chosen to avoid peri-implant fenestration and the need to perform guided bone regeneration procedures. 8 Although maxillary bone quality has been reported to be inferior compared to mandibular bone, good primary stability was achieved and immediate loading could be applied, which is an important factor for patients in need of rehabilitation in the esthetic zone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of maxillary lateral incisors rehabilitation using Morse taper connection extra‐narrow implants at 12‐month follow‐up: A case report

Thomé¹,

Vianna²,

Caldas³

et al. 2022

Clinical Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Narrow-diameter implants (≤3.5 mm) have been proposed to address the challenge of implant placement in cases of insufficient bone quantity, thin alveolar crest, and small cervical diameter teeth replacement The aim of this study is to report one-year outcomes of extra-narrow implant rehabilitation of maxillary lateral incisors, due to agenesis, in a young adult that presented sites with reduced mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions. A 26-year-old male patient in need of fixedimplant supported prostheses due to the absence of permanent maxillary lateral incisors and with limited space, was submitted to surgery to receive two 2.9 mm How to cite this article: Thomé G, Vianna CP, Caldas W, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of maxillary lateral incisors rehabilitation using Morse taper connection extra-narrow implants at 12-month follow-up: A case report.

show abstract

“…12A). 232 Biological complications include problems in the osseointegrated bone and peri-implant mucosa, resulting from bacterial invasion (Fig. 12B).…”

Section: Control Of the Implant-abutment Interfacementioning

confidence: 99%

“…12B). 232 Biological complications are divided into peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, the equivalent of gingivitis and periodontitis, respectively, in natural teeth. 168 The onset and progression of peri-implant disease and periodontal disease are similar, indicating comparable bacterial composition.…”

Section: Control Of the Implant-abutment Interfacementioning

confidence: 99%

Three interfaces of the dental implant system and their clinical effects on hard and soft tissues

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 22 publications

References 53 publications

A Novel Zirconia-Based Composite Presents an Aging Resistant Material for Narrow-Diameter Ceramic Implants

A Novel Zirconia-Based Composite Presents an Aging Resistant Material for Narrow-Diameter Ceramic Implants

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of maxillary lateral incisors rehabilitation using Morse taper connection extra‐narrow implants at 12‐month follow‐up: A case report

Three interfaces of the dental implant system and their clinical effects on hard and soft tissues

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About