2022
DOI: 10.1109/jeds.2021.3130123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrow Sub-Fin Technique for Suppressing Parasitic-Channel Effect in Stacked Nanosheet Transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gu et al. [ 38 ] proposed a new etching technique that narrowed the sub-fin with little increase in the processing cost that suppressed the PCE. Their proposed sub-fin design demonstrated a 70% reduction in the sub-channel gate-induced drain leakage and a 20% increase in the on-off current ratio ( I ON / I OFF ), along with an improvement in the SS .…”
Section: Transition From Finfet To Gaafetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gu et al. [ 38 ] proposed a new etching technique that narrowed the sub-fin with little increase in the processing cost that suppressed the PCE. Their proposed sub-fin design demonstrated a 70% reduction in the sub-channel gate-induced drain leakage and a 20% increase in the on-off current ratio ( I ON / I OFF ), along with an improvement in the SS .…”
Section: Transition From Finfet To Gaafetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, multi-gate devices have been considered the most promising devices for advanced nodes at 22 nm and beyond, with significant improvements in short-channel effects (SCEs) [1]. Compared to traditional planar MOSFETs, FinFETs exhibit higher driving capability and superior gate control ability, leading to their successful development for highvolume integrated circuits from the 22 nm to 5 nm nodes [2,3]. However, as device sizes scale down to 3 nm and beyond, FinFET faces severe SCEs due to the reduced flexibility of the fins, resulting in challenges to conventional scaling rules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They became susceptible to SCEs and reliability issues, compounded by fabrication challenges associated with further scaling. GAA NS MOSFETs have since emerged as compelling candidates for sub-5-nm nodes [17,20], offering both superior performance standards and desired capabilities [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the upper channels of stacked GAA NS MOSFETs, which are wrapped surrounded gates, the bottom parasitic channel is solely controlled by only the top gate (Fin shape) [30]. Consequently, this channel can function as a leakage path during the off-sate, impacting the overall performance of the GAA NS MOSFETs and circuit [22,31]. To address this concern, recent efforts have focused on various approaches related to suppressing the parasitic leakage in GAA devices, with a particular emphasis on the bottom dielectric isolation (BDI) [27], punchthrough stopper (PTS), buried oxide beneath the gate area [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%