1982
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.35.3.357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal brushing for the study of ciliary ultrastructure.

Abstract: Examination of cilia for structure and function may be included in the investigation of patients with recurrent nasal or pulmonary disease or both. In recent years a number of defects of ciliary structure and function have been described. These may be hereditary (primary) as in Kartagener's syndrome1 or acquired (secondary) as may follow local inflammation.2 These findings have prompted a search for further defects and the need for quantification of the range of ciliary structure which may be found in normal s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of ciliary beat (mean ± SD) for the normal subjects was (14) Hz; for patients with bronchiectasis 12-2 (1 1) Hz; and for patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia 4 7 (4 8 de Iongh, Rutland In patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia the mean number of cilia examined at each ciliary level was 28 (range 12-52), 93 (43-136), and 66 (39-140), respectively. Ciliary deviations in the two patient groups were also similar among the three regions but less so than for normal subjects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of ciliary beat (mean ± SD) for the normal subjects was (14) Hz; for patients with bronchiectasis 12-2 (1 1) Hz; and for patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia 4 7 (4 8 de Iongh, Rutland In patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia the mean number of cilia examined at each ciliary level was 28 (range 12-52), 93 (43-136), and 66 (39-140), respectively. Ciliary deviations in the two patient groups were also similar among the three regions but less so than for normal subjects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly because of the invasiveness and risk of most techniques aimed at collecting human cells (eg, biopsies), the small number of cells thus collected, or the limited number, poor quality, and nonrepresentative nature of samples resulting from surgery (such as nasal polypectomies or lung transplants). Brushing of the respiratory tract, however, a noninvasive method originally proposed for ciliary studies (Kelsen et al, 1992;Rutland and Cole, 1980;Rutland et al, 1982), allows the easy sampling of numerous, representative, wellpreserved, and dissociated cells from the superficial mucosa (Bridges et al, 1991;Chapelin et al, 1996;Danel et al, 1996). The present study was thus performed on cell samples obtained by nasal brushings of F508del homozygous patients with CF, F508del carriers, and non-CF control subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most human studies are performed on biopsies, which focus on a limited area and only allow the number of each cell type to be expressed in relation to a unit area. Brushing of the respiratory tract, a noninvasive method originally proposed for ciliary studies, harvests cells in a larger area of airway mucosa than biopsy [8,9]. Recovering superficial cells from nasal mucosa by brushing is safe and easy to perform, and allows quantification of the various cell types after cytocentrifugation [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%