2020
DOI: 10.1002/lary.28682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow in Healthy and Obstructed Patients: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Abstract: Objectives Nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) is a practical and affordable tool that measures maximum inspiratory flow rate through both nostrils. Although NPIF values for healthy controls and patients appear to differ considerably, a generally expected value for populations with and without nasal obstruction has yet to be established. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the mean NPIF value in populations with and without nasal obstruction. Methods Medline (1946–) and Embase (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three recordings at each time point (Table 6 ) were performed and the highest value was used for analysis [ 80 ]. The PNIF measurements were compared to the baseline value before the exposure on an individual basis, and a decrease in PNIF indicated an increased nasal obstruction [ 81 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three recordings at each time point (Table 6 ) were performed and the highest value was used for analysis [ 80 ]. The PNIF measurements were compared to the baseline value before the exposure on an individual basis, and a decrease in PNIF indicated an increased nasal obstruction [ 81 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimally clinically important difference of 20 L/min has been defined and a lack of improvement of 20 L/min or 20% after decongestion may indicate a structural cause of obstruction 1595–1597 . An SRMA reported mean PNIF values in normal adults of 128.4 and 97.5 L/min for obstructed adults 1598 . However, standardized values have yielded inconsistent results due to multiple confounding factors including patient effort, pulmonary status, nasal valve collapse, smoking, height, and recent physical exercise 1599,1600 .…”
Section: Evaluation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three recordings at each time point (Table 7) were performed and the highest value was used for analysis (62). The PNIF measurements were compared to the baseline value before the exposure on an individual basis, and a decrease in PNIF indicated an increased nasal obstruction (63).…”
Section: Medical Assessment Nasal Patency and Pulmonary Function Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%