2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nash Q-learning agents in Hotelling’s model: Reestablishing equilibrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypothesis Based on Hotelling's model and Armstrong's platform‐pricing model (Armstrong, 2006; Saur et al, 2022; Vainer & Kukacka, 2021), we propose the assumption of a duopoly environment assuming that there are two technology‐trading platforms (platform 1 and platform 2) in the market and that the platform‐pricing model will be characterized in conjunction with the transition stage from an “information‐intermediary platform model” to a “one‐stop‐service platform model”.Hypothesis According to the bilateral market theory (Wang & Fu, 2019; Wang & Guo, 2017; Zhao & Wang, 2020), there are three types of participants in the pricing model of technology‐trading platforms: the platform operator, technology provider, and technology demander, all of which are finite rational “economic men”. The platform operator provides services to providers and demanders to obtain revenue.…”
Section: Hypotheses and The Two‐stage Dynamic Game Model Of Technolog...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hypothesis Based on Hotelling's model and Armstrong's platform‐pricing model (Armstrong, 2006; Saur et al, 2022; Vainer & Kukacka, 2021), we propose the assumption of a duopoly environment assuming that there are two technology‐trading platforms (platform 1 and platform 2) in the market and that the platform‐pricing model will be characterized in conjunction with the transition stage from an “information‐intermediary platform model” to a “one‐stop‐service platform model”.Hypothesis According to the bilateral market theory (Wang & Fu, 2019; Wang & Guo, 2017; Zhao & Wang, 2020), there are three types of participants in the pricing model of technology‐trading platforms: the platform operator, technology provider, and technology demander, all of which are finite rational “economic men”. The platform operator provides services to providers and demanders to obtain revenue.…”
Section: Hypotheses and The Two‐stage Dynamic Game Model Of Technolog...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesis 1. Based on Hotelling's model and Armstrong's platform-pricing model (Armstrong, 2006;Saur et al, 2022;Vainer & Kukacka, 2021), we propose the assumption of a duopoly environment assuming that there are two technology-trading platforms (platform 1 and platform 2) in the market and that the platformpricing model will be characterized in conjunction with the transition stage from an "information-intermediary platform model" to a "one-stop-service platform model".…”
Section: Hypotheses and The Two-stage Dynamic Game Model Of Technolog...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies supplement this limitation with computational economics methods, such as ABMs and Q-learning algorithms (Gallay & Hongler, 2009) Q-learning agents, representative reinforcement learning agents, are incorporated into economic models (Charpentier et al, in press). Game theory studies examine how learning agents affect equilibria (Vainer & Kukacka, 2021;Xu, 2021). When a learning agent is incorporated into an oligopoly game framework, the collusion strategy dominates; thus, learning agents are mainly used in research on collusion (Calvano et al, 2020(Calvano et al, , 2021Gautier et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%