Nasjonal politikk og internasjonale forhandlinger

Farsund, Arild Aurvåg; Langhelle, Oluf

doi:10.18261/9788215050010-2020-07

Cited by 3 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We also build on Vatn (1984, 1989), Farsund (2004), Grue (2014a, 2014b) and Almås (2002)—six empirically rich historical inquiries which in combination cover the period in question. These secondary sources contribute to the construction of the narrative, as well as to guiding and enlightening our reading of the empirical material.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The international framework conditions for Norwegian agriculture changed significantly around the turn of the century (Farsund, 2014). Initially, the implementation of the WTO agreement in Norwegian agricultural policies created conflicts between the Ministry of Agriculture and the two agricultural associations (Farsund, 2004). However, the coalition soon began a pursuit of strategies that could secure a viable agricultural sector within the framework of the agreement.…”

Section: -Present: Multifunctionality and New Productivismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…International agreements and negotiations have placed limitations on Norwegian agricultural policies in recent decades. Nevertheless, many of the important political decisions regarding the development of goals and instruments for the agricultural industry have been agreed through negotiations between the Ministry of Agriculture and the two associations representing farmers (Farsund & Veggeland, 2016). In this context, geographical distribution of production has remained a unifying goal able to sustain the compromise despite the changes in circumstances.…”

Section: -Present: Multifunctionality and New Productivismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This, combined with low profitability and a weak agricultural economy, initiated a growing acknowledgement that market regulation was necessary (Vatn, 1984). These conditions gave rise to regulative institutions, such as the trade law and the law on import, along with various measures (like rations and caps on concentrate) that attempted to ameliorate the dairy situation (Farsund, 2004). The government also established a public grain monopoly in 1928 (the State Grain Business) which was granted both the right to import grain and the obligation to buy all domestically produced grain at a price above the world market price (Agricultural Committee of 1956, 1960).…”

Section: Four Phases In Canalisation Policy Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the canalisation policy essentially regulates a fundamental conflict of interest in the relationship between feed producers (grain farmers) and feed consumers (mainly dairy farmers). Thus, despite conflicting interests, the policy has been described as ‘an expression of solidarity among farmers in different parts of the country’ (Farsund, 2004, pp. 33−34).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Same but different: On continuity and change in agricultural policy reforms

Melås,

Vik,

Farsund

2024

Scand Pol Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article contributes to the Historical Institutionalism literature on stability and change by unpacking how an institution has persisted for more than 70 years despite substantial contextual changes. The overall stability of the institution comes both through changes in policy instruments and their settings, and through the incorporation of differing, but aligned rationales. Ideational multidimensionality yields stability by providing leeway to recondition the institution in response to changing circumstances. This allows for different interests in the coalition to stimulate overall institutional stability by supporting incremental changes in policy instruments whilst avoiding institutional exhaustion and third order changes. This shows that policies initiated under a certain set of circumstances may be better equipped to persist when circumstances change if they are able to incorporate differing, but aligned, rationales and to respond to upcoming issues through policy instrument changes. The theoretical arguments are exemplified through a case study analysis of Norwegian agricultural policy.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: -Present: Multifunctionality and New Productivismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: -Present: Multifunctionality and New Productivismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Four Phases In Canalisation Policy Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Same but different: On continuity and change in agricultural policy reforms

Melås,

Vik,

Farsund

2024

Scand Pol Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

2. Norges handelsforhandlinger med EU gjennom50 år: Sakskoblinger og forhandlingsmakt

Melchior¹

2020

Sjømatnæringen Og Europa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sammendrag Kapitlet gir en historisk oversikt over Norges handelsforhandlinger med EU fra 1973 og fram til i dag, med saerlig vekt på utfallet for sjømatnaeringen. Rundt 1990 ga EFTA forhandlingsmakt til tross for ulike naeringsinteresser. EØS-forhandlingene var i 1991 preget av sakskoblinger der mange felter var i spill, og det ble oppnådd betydelige tollreduksjoner for sjømat. Senere har forhandlingene vaert adskilt i parallelle spor med svake sakskoblinger. Norge har med redusert forhandlingsmakt blitt presset til stadig økning i EØS-midlene, men frihandel for fisk er aldri oppnådd selv om betydelige tollkvoter er gitt som kompensasjon for tidligere frihandelsavtaler med nye EU-medlemsland.

show abstract

Landbruks- og fiskerinæringene i Norge: Klart utenfor, men stadig mer innenfor EU?

Farsund

2023

Internasjonal Politikk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Denne artikkelen retter oppmerksomheten mot utviklingstrekk i landbruks- og fiskeripolitikken i Norge og EU etter iverksettingen av EØS-avtalen i 1994. Det argumenteres for at politikken på begge områder har blitt likere, og dette forklares ut fra at både Norge og EU må forholde seg til de samme internasjonale avtalene, at begge deler mange av de samme ideene angående hva som god politikk og at Norge i økende grad importerer lover og regler fra EU. Avslutningsvis argumenteres det med at fortsatt EØS-tilknytning vil være langt mindre utfordrende for landbruks- og fiskerinæringene enn en ny frihandelsavtale eller et EU-medlemskap. Abstract in English:Agriculture and Fisheries in Norway. Outside, but Increasingly Inside the EU?This article draws attention to developments in agricultural and fisheries policy in Norway and the EU after the implementation of the EEA Agreement in 1994. It is argued that the policy in both areas has become more similar, and this is explained by the fact that both Norway and the EU must follow the same international agreements, that both share many of the same ideas regarding what constitutes proper policies, and that Norway is increasingly importing laws and regulations from the EU. In conclusion, it is argued that continued EEA association will be far less challenging for the agricultural and fishing industries than a new free trade agreement or EU membership.

show abstract

Nasjonal politikk og internasjonale forhandlinger

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Same but different: On continuity and change in agricultural policy reforms

Same but different: On continuity and change in agricultural policy reforms

2. Norges handelsforhandlinger med EU gjennom50 år: Sakskoblinger og forhandlingsmakt

Landbruks- og fiskerinæringene i Norge: Klart utenfor, men stadig mer innenfor EU?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About