Nasolabial Sulcus Rejuvenation: Paranasal Augmentation Using a Folded Dermal Graft

Lee, Soo Hyang; Sung, Ki Pyo; Kim, Sean; Kim, Heung-Kyu

doi:10.1007/s00266-021-02760-z

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dong et al 2 reported a case series of 68 patients using diced cartilage for paranasal augmentation; costal cartilage migration occurred in 13 (19.1%) patients, and partial resorption occurred in 2 (2.9%) patients. Lee and his coworkers 16 used buttock dermal grafts for paranasal augmentation. The average absorption rates were 38.72%, 49.36%, and 49.92% at postoperative months 6, 12, and 18, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Paranasal Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Asians With Midfacial Concavity

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: For Asian rhinoplasty patients with midfacial concavity, the conventional method is to solve the problem by using structural rhinoplasty to increase the nasal height and length. However, the results are not satisfying, and many complications are caused.Paranasal augmentation as an adjunct to rhinoplasty can improve surgical results and increase satisfaction. However, there are limited studies focusing on the details and evaluation of this technique. Objectives: To investigate a minimally invasive method to correct midfacial concavity simultaneously with rhinoplasty, as well as improve satisfaction and reduce complications. Materials and Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2019, we reviewed all rhinoplasty patient records from patients who had midfacial concavity and underwent simultaneous paranasal augmentation with our technique. The patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Satisfaction was evaluated by an independent medical staff who reviewed the preoperative and postoperative photos. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 28.7 ± 8.0 years, and the median follow-up time was 26 months (range, 2-60 months). Overall satisfaction was high (90%). Eight (12%) patients had complications, including 5 (7.4%) cases of implant displacement and 3 (4.4%) cases of infection. All patients healed uneventfully after revision surgery. Conclusions: Paranasal augmentation can improve the outcome and increase satisfaction in Asian rhinoplasty patients who have midfacial concavity. Preoperative patient evaluation, surgery planning, and surgery details are crucial to ensure a favorable result. The expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implant has advantages over other materials and therefore is recommended in paranasal augmentation surgery.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Paranasal Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Asians With Midfacial Concavity

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The best treatment is still controversial. 3,4 Although closed reduction is a more conservative treatment, it can cause many problems, which mostly occur as a result of intermaxillary fixation (IMF). 5 Open reduction can provide stabilization and function immediately.…”

Section: Three-dimensional Navigation-assisted Open Reduction and Int...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For paranasal concavity without occlusal deformity, paranasal augmentation is a minimally invasive procedure with significant esthetic effects. The augmentation material can be autologous tissues, including fat, 1 cartilage, 2 and dermis, 3 which have the same disadvantages of graft resorption and donor site morbidity; whereas the use of alloplastic materials shorten operation time, avoid donor site morbidity, and the implant materials are readily accessible. Silicone, due to its strong hydrophobicity and solid nonporous nature, is more likely to cause infection, capsular contracture, and bone resorption 4 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Screw Misposition and Detachment During Paranasal Augmentation: A Patient Report With Complication and Management

Yu,

Lu,

Wang

2023

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Paranasal concavity is esthetically displeasing and interferes with the overall outline of the face. Paranasal augmentation with alloplastic implants is a minimally invasive procedure with significant esthetic effects for paranasal concavity. When fixing the implants, the screws should be placed on the nasofrontal column, but are occasionally mispositioned on the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. Here, the authors introduce a case of paranasal augmentation in which the self-tapping screw accidentally penetrated through the implant, broke through the anterior and medial walls of the maxillary sinus, and entered the nasal cavity. The screw was located by a computed tomography scan and was successfully removed under a nasal endoscope. The causes of this intraoperative complication were analyzed, emergent management was introduced, and a further preventive strategy was proposed.

show abstract

Nasolabial Sulcus Rejuvenation: Paranasal Augmentation Using a Folded Dermal Graft

Cited by 2 publications

References 17 publications

Application of Paranasal Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Asians With Midfacial Concavity

Application of Paranasal Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Asians With Midfacial Concavity

Screw Misposition and Detachment During Paranasal Augmentation: A Patient Report With Complication and Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About