2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasometry normative data for young Dutch children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like in our present findings, no significant difference between genders for the two stimuli were found. The same has been observed by several other authors (16)(17)(18)(19) . This result may be related to the fact that fundamental frequency of girls and boys are similar until puberty (29) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Like in our present findings, no significant difference between genders for the two stimuli were found. The same has been observed by several other authors (16)(17)(18)(19) . This result may be related to the fact that fundamental frequency of girls and boys are similar until puberty (29) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The use of nasometry in different countries soon has shown that nasalance varies according to the language spoken (9)(10)(11)(12)(13) . Studies with Brazilian Portuguese speakers, including children, have shown that nasalance can also vary according to age, gender or the type of emission (syllables and/or sentences) (14,15) , confirming observations for other languages (13,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, a controversy exists about the differences in nasalance values, obtained by the Nasometer [4], for age and gender (table 1). Some authors report low correlations between age and nasalance [10,11,16,17,18,19,20], while others mention significantly lower nasalance values in younger children compared with older children for nasal sentences [21,22] and oral texts [22], or lower nasalance scores for certain speech stimuli in children compared with adults [23,24,25,26]. Possible explanations for these differences are the stronger evidence of coarticulation in adult speakers as a result of speaking experience [27], age-related changes in lymphoid and gland tissue at the velopharyngeal port [28], and the growth of the oropharynx [29] and nasal cavity [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been conducted to evaluate nasalization norms amount, especially in children using Nasal view software and sometimes Nasometer. These studies, albeit confirming significant differences in nasalization scores in different languages and accents, have to interpret separately [19][20][21][22]. According to the results of studies and statistical analysis, Nasometer is suitable for evaluating resonance disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%