2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfms.2011.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasopharyngeal stenosis with concurrent hiatal hernia and megaesophagus in an 8-year-old cat

Abstract: A case of nasopharyngeal stenosis with secondary hiatal hernia is described. An 8-year-old castrated male domestic shorthair cat was referred for a chronic upper respiratory problem and presumptive vomiting. Despite conservative management by the primary care veterinarian, the cat's condition progressed. The cat was presented to an emergency facility prior to referral to a specialty hospital. On presentation, inspiratory stridor was evident. Thoracic radiography revealed a hiatal hernia. Computed tomography in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ME in this case resolved after excision of the nasopharyngeal polyp, as in a reported case with resolution of ME after polyp removal 2) . Similar regression of ME and hiatal hernia after resolution of concurrent nasopharyngeal stenosis has been reported in a cat 3) , suggesting that ME can occur because of pharyngeal obstruction with not only a mass but also stenosis. The exact mechanism of ME development secondary to pharyngeal mass or stenosis is unknown, but chronic aerophagia 2) or negative intrapleural pressure caused by increased inspiratory effort 3) is thought to play a role in progression of ME.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ME in this case resolved after excision of the nasopharyngeal polyp, as in a reported case with resolution of ME after polyp removal 2) . Similar regression of ME and hiatal hernia after resolution of concurrent nasopharyngeal stenosis has been reported in a cat 3) , suggesting that ME can occur because of pharyngeal obstruction with not only a mass but also stenosis. The exact mechanism of ME development secondary to pharyngeal mass or stenosis is unknown, but chronic aerophagia 2) or negative intrapleural pressure caused by increased inspiratory effort 3) is thought to play a role in progression of ME.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The causes of ME include neuromuscular disease, esophageal obstruction, toxicity, neoplasia, or esophagitis, with limited surgically treatable conditions 5) . Recently, spontaneous regression of ME after resolution of pharyngeal obstruction was reported in a young cat with nasopharyngeal polyp 2) and in a cat with nasopharyngeal stenosis 3) . We describe a feline case in which ME resolved after excision of a concomitant nasopharyngeal polyp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Congenital hiatal hernia, as other congenital malformations (Pisoni et al 2012;Tremolada et al 2013) is an uncommon abnormality in dogs and rare in cats, but various reports are available in the literature (Gaskell et al 1974;Teunissen et al 1978;Peterson 1983;Ellison et al 1987;Miles et al 1988;Prymak et al 1989;Bright et al 1990;Williams 1990;Brinkley 1990;White 1993;Callan et al 1993;Auger and Riley1997;Hardie et al 1998;Lorinson and Bright 1998;Sivacolundhu et al 2002;Rahal et al 2003;Kirkby et al 2005;Owen et al 2005;Ardnt et al 2006;Baig et al 2006;Keeley et al 2008;DeSandre-Robinson et al 2011), most of which are congenital, such as, apparently, the case described in the present report. Despite the several cases reported, the pathogenesis is not completely understood and, similarly, the therapeutic protocol has not been standardised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, DeSandre‐Robinson et al . ). This technique also has been associated with a high rate of recurrence of the stenosis, and multiple dilatation procedures may be necessary (Glaus et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Currently, there is no published evidence of long-term successful treatment with this technique and it has been reported to have a high rate of recurrence (Coolman et al 1998, Novo & Kramek 1999, Glaus et al 2002. A minimally invasive technique with endoscopy-guided balloon dilatation has also been described (Glaus et al 2002, Boswood et al 2003, Glaus et al 2005, Berent et al 2006, DeSandre-Robinson et al 2011. This technique also has been associated with a high rate of recurrence of the stenosis, and multiple dilatation procedures may be necessary (Glaus et al 2002, Schafgans et al 2012, Berent 2016, Burdick et al 2018 To reduce the risk of recurrent stenosis, the use of metallic or soft stents has been proposed in addition to balloon dilation in order to maintain the nasopharyngeal opening during the healing phase (Novo & Kramek 1999, Berent et al 2008, Cook et al 2013, De Lorenzi et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%