PsycEXTRA Dataset 1992
DOI: 10.1037/e477672004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NASP re-entry profile: Effects of low-level +gz on reaction time, keypad entry, and reach error.

Abstract: The voluntary informed consent of the subjects used in this research was obtained as required by Air Force Regulation 169-3. This report has been reviewed by the Office of Public Affairs (PA) and is releasable to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). At NTIS, it will be available to the general public, including foreign nations. This technical report has been reviewed and is approved for publication. FOR THE COMMANDER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicated that performance decreases significantly from baseline performance (as much as 77% at 8 Gz). Additional studies have evaluated visual acuity during acceleration using various G profiles and metrics (Frankenhauser, 1958;McCloskey, et al, 1992;Repperger Frazier, Popper, & Goodyear, 1989;Warrick & Lund, 1946;White, 1960;White, 1962). Again, many of these studies utilized relatively low G z (5 G z or less) and took place prior to advancements in G z protection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated that performance decreases significantly from baseline performance (as much as 77% at 8 Gz). Additional studies have evaluated visual acuity during acceleration using various G profiles and metrics (Frankenhauser, 1958;McCloskey, et al, 1992;Repperger Frazier, Popper, & Goodyear, 1989;Warrick & Lund, 1946;White, 1960;White, 1962). Again, many of these studies utilized relatively low G z (5 G z or less) and took place prior to advancements in G z protection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%