2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01000.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NASPE Expert Consensus Conference: Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Children with and without Congenital Heart Disease. Report of the Writing Committee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
95
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
4
95
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data are consistent with other international series [1][2][3][4] , confirming that RFA is an effective and safe alternative in the long term for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias with difficult clinical control in pediatric patients. The atrioventricular tachycardia involving accessory pathways of AV conduction is the most frequent indication for ablation in children, followed by nodal reentrant tachycardia and atrial tachycardia 11 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data are consistent with other international series [1][2][3][4] , confirming that RFA is an effective and safe alternative in the long term for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias with difficult clinical control in pediatric patients. The atrioventricular tachycardia involving accessory pathways of AV conduction is the most frequent indication for ablation in children, followed by nodal reentrant tachycardia and atrial tachycardia 11 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the use of RFA in children under five years of age and/or weighing less than 15 kg is still controversial 4 . There are many variables that increase the complexity and risk of the procedure in this age group, such as vascular access limitations, small heart, possible anatomical variations due to the presence of congenital heart disease, lesion expansion and potential effects of exposure to radiation on developing cells [5][6][7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a 2001 subgroup analysis of patients younger than 18 month-old (all of whom weighed under 15 kg) showed no increased procedural risk relative to the rest of the database population [6]. This controversy was highlighted by the recently published North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) expert consensus conference in which the use of RFA in children younger than 5 years of age with SVT refractory to drug therapy, including sotalol and amiodarone, was believed to represent a class IIb indication [14]. Lastly, Aiyagari et al [3] reported on the risks and results of RFA use in children under 15 kg and between 15 and 20 kg, stating that RFA use in small children was safe and effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently reported complications are second and third degree AV blocks, perforation, pericardial effusion, embolization, brachial plexus injury, and pneumothorax (27). Also, in rare cases coronary artery injuries were reported during or after ablation procedure (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%