2012
DOI: 10.1080/13537113.2012.707492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nation-Building, Collective Identity, and Language Choices: Between Instrumental and Value Rationalities

Abstract: The discussion of the place of language in politics has generally revolved around its relationship to nation-building and ethnic conflict. Yet, these are not always causally connected nor is language easily given up for the sake of a greater national or individual good. Attitudes regarding language can be influenced by anticolonialist resentments, memories of past injustice, status paranoia, xenophobia, collective megalomania, religion, ideology, and the desire on the part of a group to base its collective ide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linguistic minorities are groups prone to such cultural sensitivities. Language has an important attachment for linguistic groups as its well-being represents the symbolic security of the group (Laitin 1998;Safran and Liu 2012). Yet, the vitality of a language can have more tangible impacts as it is often attached to economic considerations for group members (Giles and Johnson 1987;Woolard 1989).…”
Section: Intergroup Attitudes: the Power Of Cultural Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistic minorities are groups prone to such cultural sensitivities. Language has an important attachment for linguistic groups as its well-being represents the symbolic security of the group (Laitin 1998;Safran and Liu 2012). Yet, the vitality of a language can have more tangible impacts as it is often attached to economic considerations for group members (Giles and Johnson 1987;Woolard 1989).…”
Section: Intergroup Attitudes: the Power Of Cultural Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, where religious groups are linguistically divided, their potential for collective action might well be smaller. Safran and Liu (2012, 273) argue that the very preservation of religious group identities depends on the use of a language that is distinct from the dominant language in a state. The fact that Sunni Kurdish fighters are at the forefront of fighting the Sunni Arab ISIS rebellion in Syria and Iraq is a clear example.…”
Section: Rebel Mobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to shed light on the fact that languages are not equal (Liu 2015). For example, some languages are spoken by the majority (Safran and Liu 2012). Others have economic value in terms of their association with an increase in investments (Kim et al 2015), trade (Hutchinson 2002) or wages (Ginsburgh et al 2007).…”
Section: Tolerance Language and Cultural Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%