National 4-H Common Measures: Initial Evaluation from California 4-H

4-H SNAC Clubs engage youth in low-income schools with majority Latinx enrollment in leadership activities to increase schoolwide health and wellness. 4-H SNAC Clubs aim to develop youth health leaders, establish youth-adult partnerships, and increase access to 4-H in Latinx communities. Outcomes related to healthful living and positive youth development were assessed using the Teen Teacher Retrospective Survey (n=59) across five 4-H SNAC Clubs. Results show positive outcomes related to self-reported health behaviors for students and their families and leadership development. 4-H SNAC Clubs can increase access to 4-H among Latinx youth and support healthier communities through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program – Education programming.

show abstract

Measurement and Credible Evidence in Extension Evaluations

Braverman

2019

JJSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the concept of credible evidence in Extension evaluations with specific attention to the measures and measurement strategies used to collect and create data. Credibility depends on multiple factors, including data quality and methodological rigor, characteristics of the stakeholder audience, stakeholder beliefs about the information source, and the evaluation context. Measurement planning involves a process of making thoughtful decisions about choosing study variables, measurement strategies, and specific measures that adequately reflect the content and goals of the program being evaluated. The use of specific measures may also entail implicit assumptions, e.g., that the respondent is being truthful and accurate, which must be accepted if resulting data are to be viewed as credible. The article discusses aspects of measurement quality, including reliability and validity, for both quantitative and qualitative forms of data. Program stakeholders should be encouraged to be attentive, reflective, and critical in their analysis of evaluation evidence, and their views on what makes data credible must be understood and considered. The use of common measures in evaluating multi-site programs can be valuable, but only if the measures are fully appropriate for local sites. The article concludes with a summary of implications and recommendations for Extension evaluation practice.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

National 4-H Common Measures: Initial Evaluation from California 4-H

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Teen Cuisine: Impacting Dietary Habits and Food Preparation Skills in Adolescents

Teen Cuisine: Impacting Dietary Habits and Food Preparation Skills in Adolescents

4-H Student Nutrition Advisory Councils Support Positive Youth Development and Health Outcomes Among Underserved Populations

Measurement and Credible Evidence in Extension Evaluations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About