2015
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2015.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National and firm-level drivers of the devolution of HRM decision making to line managers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Croucher et al (2010) had similar findings, noting also that collective employee voice (see below) had no impact, but that calculative HRM strategies were significant. In line with Gooderham et al (2015), Poutsma, Ligthart, and Schouteten (2005) too observe considerable diversity at the within-country level.…”
Section: Compensationsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Croucher et al (2010) had similar findings, noting also that collective employee voice (see below) had no impact, but that calculative HRM strategies were significant. In line with Gooderham et al (2015), Poutsma, Ligthart, and Schouteten (2005) too observe considerable diversity at the within-country level.…”
Section: Compensationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Employing a multi-level analysis, Gooderham et al (2015) examine the impact of firm and national level characteristics on the location of the primary responsibility for HRM decision-making concerning the following four HRM areas: pay and benefits; recruitment and selection; training and development; and industrial relations. At the national level, they CONTEXT AND HRM: THEORY, EVIDENCE, AND PROPOSALS employ Botero et al (2004) in order to test whether institutional conditions influence the location of HRM decision making.…”
Section: The Strategic Role Of the Hrm Department In Hrm Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranet research has examined the role of the HRM department in relation to line managers, finding firm and national level influences (Brewster, Brookes, & Gollan, 2015;Gooderham, Morley, Parry, & Stavrou, 2015). Both formal and informal institutions influence the role of the HRM function so that organisations in LME countries are the least likely to assign responsibilities for HRM to the line.…”
Section: The Significance Of National Context On Hrm Organisational Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is assumed that the HRM function is considered a partner to the business (Lawler & Boudreau, 2009;Tarique & Schuler, 2014) and is capable of "managing" organisational cultures and supplying leadership and technical talent across the organisation (Garavan, 2012;Tansley & Tietze, 2013). Powerful HRM functions (in this study, variables that test HRM strategy-business strategy alignment) are those that have board level representation, form part of the top team and are involved in the strategic decision making of the organisation and are taken seriously (Gooderham, Morley, Parry, & Stavrou, 2015;Lawler, 2009;Sheehan, De Cieri, Cooper, & Brooks, 2014). Yet TM is viewed as the remit of the senior management team (Fernandez-Araoz, Groysberg, & Nohria, 2011), and HRM as a function has struggled with its image and is often excluded from decision making, playing only a secondary role in cultural integration (Björkman & Soderberg, 2006;Lawler & Mohrman, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%