2015
DOI: 10.1134/s1064229315110113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National approaches to evaluation of the degree of soil degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…layers [12]. Along with the loss of organic material and nutrients, the effect of soil being dried out by the wind promotes surface compaction [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…layers [12]. Along with the loss of organic material and nutrients, the effect of soil being dried out by the wind promotes surface compaction [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the absence of conservationist strategies, which usually occur in secluded areas, grazing, abandonment of farmlands, and deforestation increase the effects of wind erosion, producing significant loss of soil material, mainly from the most fertile layers [12]. Along with the loss of organic material and nutrients, the effect of soil being dried out by the wind promotes surface compaction [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lozano et al (2013) and Giménez et al (2019) analysed the relationships between wind speed, wind erosion, soil type and vegetation in semiarid regions. Wind erosion influences soil drying and nutrient loss (Molchanov et al, 2015), both of which are conditioned by soil surface compaction. Vegetation protects the soil from wind erosion by reducing wind speed, it also reduces soil erodibility, and traps eroded material (Touré et al, 2011;Leenders et al, 2011;Asensio et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 дельные среды, химической и биохимической активности присутствующих в них веществ, так и по агрохимическим показателям, определяющим почвенное плодородие и условия питания растений [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
unclassified
“…М., 1994. 31 3) биологическая и биохимическая; 4) гидрологическая [6,19,20] 12 Исходя из приведенного анализа, по мнению авторов, необходимо внести уточнения в имеющиеся методики оценки деградации почв при непосредственном применении таковых для орошаемых пашни и пастбищ в соответствии с данными, накопленными российскими учеными [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. [30] < 10 10-20 21-50 51-70 > 70 Уменьшение водопрочных агрегатов, % от оптимума [22] < 1 1-30 31-50 51-80 > 80 Коэффициент фильтрации 2 , м/сут > 1,0 1,0-0,4 0,3-0,1 0,09-0,01 < 0,01 Общее содержание солей (по величине плотного остатка) [20], % * < 0,30 0,30-0,50 0,51-1,00 1,10-2,00 > 2,00 Кислотно-щелочной фактор [22], в т. ч.: -кислотность, рН (KCl) > 6,0 6,0-5,6 5,5-5,0 5,0-4,5 < 4,5 -щелочность, рН водной суспензии 1:2,5 < 7,5 [24], моль(экв.…”
unclassified