2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. II. Clinical outcomes

Abstract: outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. II. Clinical outcomes AbstractPurpose This national study was designed to audit anatomical outcome and complications relating to primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. This paper presents success and complication rates, and examines variations in outcome. Methods Sampling and recruitment details of this nationwide cross-sectional survey of 768 patients of 167 consultant ophthalmologists having their first operation for rhegmatog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
30
4
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
30
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2,5 In this study there was no difference for different grades of surgeons in terms of primary anatomical success and both groups had similar visual outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…2,5 In this study there was no difference for different grades of surgeons in terms of primary anatomical success and both groups had similar visual outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Today, surgical repair of RRD, using advanced technology, achieves a primary success rate of 90% [3][4][5]. In spite of this, visual acuity of the patients following treatment is still limited [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With primary anatomical success rates ranging from 81-92% in uncomplicated cases, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] 65-70% in high-risk eyes, or 75% when no break is found, 2,[8][9][10][11][12] visual recovery is not certain. Even with successful re-attachment of the retina, the visual acuity (VA) may not return to the pre-morbid level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%