1999
DOI: 10.26686/nzaroe.v0i9.1386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Certificate of Educational Achievement: Issues of Reliability, Validity and Manageability

Abstract: This paper examines the implications of the NCEA approach to standards-based assessment, in particular the reliability of assessment against separate achievement standards, and the pedagogical implications of the policy of non-aggregation. The paper argues that assessment against separate standards is unlikely to yield sufficiently reliable results to satisfy public credibility, and that the same focus is likely to foster a “bricks without mortar” approach to course design, delivery and assessment. The paper a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the writers, under the theme of "curriculum fragmentation," has consistently argued that NCEA does not give enough attention to the development of integration and transfer of important knowledge and skills within subjects, let alone across disciplines (Hall, 2000;2005;. The following extract captures the problem:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the writers, under the theme of "curriculum fragmentation," has consistently argued that NCEA does not give enough attention to the development of integration and transfer of important knowledge and skills within subjects, let alone across disciplines (Hall, 2000;2005;. The following extract captures the problem:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall (2000Hall ( , 2005Hall ( , 2016 has criticised the designers of NCEA for creating a structure that "fragments" course design, teaching and learning. As noted by Hall (2016), the design of NCEA:…”
Section: Assessment Of Stem Learning Through Nceamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gonczi and others (Gonczi et a1.,1990; Gonczi &Hager, 1991;Hager & Gonczi, 1993;Gonczi, 1999;Hall, 2000) suggest that these problems have arisen from the way in which competence has been conceptualised. They suggest that the traditional approaches used to develop competency standards concentrate only on the tasks that need to be performed or the generic capabilities or capacities that are said to underpin competency irrespective of the contexts in which these need to be applied.…”
Section: Ij Characteristics Ofcompetencementioning
confidence: 99%