2019
DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Databases in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comparison of Demographics, Procedures, and Outcomes

Abstract: Level III, prognostic study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is possible that patients may have been improperly included or excluded due to potential errors within the ACS-NSQIP database. While the NSQIP database is frequently utilized, 44,45 there was no obvious way to correct for this. Furthermore, the NSQIP database does not provide information with regard to the specialty of the treating physician; it is possible that the outcomes of augmentation procedures conducted by interventional radiologists differ from those performed by surgeons or other subspecialists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is possible that patients may have been improperly included or excluded due to potential errors within the ACS-NSQIP database. While the NSQIP database is frequently utilized, 44,45 there was no obvious way to correct for this. Furthermore, the NSQIP database does not provide information with regard to the specialty of the treating physician; it is possible that the outcomes of augmentation procedures conducted by interventional radiologists differ from those performed by surgeons or other subspecialists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions may require consultations from other departments. 6 7 22 23 Moreover, it is occasionally difficult to differentiate between the normal physiologic changes and pathologic presentations in children. This is because their musculoskeletal characteristics change continuously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, it is possible that patients may have been improperly included or excluded due to potential errors within the ACS-NSQIP database. While the NSQIP database is highly regarded and frequently referenced, 27,28 there was no obvious way to correct for this. Another challenge with the NSQIP database is its use of the term “null” instead of “no” when identifying patients with CNS tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%