National Development and Regional Differences in eHealth Maturity in Finnish Public Health Care: Survey Study

Abstract

Background eHealth increasingly affects the delivery of health care around the world and the quest for more efficient health systems. In Finland, the development of eHealth maturity has been systematically studied since 2003, through surveys conducted every 3 years. It has also been monitored in several international studies. The indicators used in these studies examined the availability of the electronic patient record, picture archiving and communication system, health information exchange, and other key eHealth functionalities. Objective The first aim is to study the national development in the maturity level of eHealth in primary health care and specialized care between 2011 and 2020 in Finland. The second aim is to clarify the regional differences in the maturity level of eHealth among Finnish hospital districts in 2020. Methods Data for this study were collected in 2011, 2014, 2017, and 2020, using web-based questionnaires from the Use of information and communication technology surveys in Finnish health care project. In total, 16 indicators were selected to describe the status of eHealth, and they were based on international eHealth studies and Finnish eHealth surveys in 3 areas: applications, regional integration, and data security and information and communications technology skills. The indicators remain the same in all the study years; therefore, the results are comparable. Results All the specialized care organizations (21/21, 100%) in 2011, 2014, 2017, and 2020 participated in the study. The response rate among primary health care organizations was 86.3% (139/161) in 2011, 88.2% (135/153) in 2014, 85.8% (121/141) in 2017, and 95.6% (130/136) in 2020. At the national level, the biggest developments in eHealth maturity occurred between 2011 and 2014. The development has since continued, and some indicators have been saturated. Primary health care lags behind specialized care organizations, as measured by all the indicators and throughout the period under review. Regionally, there are differences among different types of organizations. Conclusions eHealth maturity has steadily progressed in Finland nationally, and its implementation has also been promoted through various national strategies and legislative changes. Some eHealth indicators have already been saturated and achieved an intensity of use rate of 100%. However, the scope for development remains, especially in primary health care. As Finland has long been a pioneer in the digitalization of health care, the results of this study show that the functionalities of eHealth will be adopted in stages, and deployment will take time; therefore, national eHealth strategies and legislative changes need to be implemented in a timely manner. The comprehensive sample size used in this study allows a regional comparison in the country, compared with previous country-specific international studies.

Virtual communication is commonly used in Finnish interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meetings

“…However, as a special feature of Finnish ILD MDM, respondents did not recognize problems in technology or infrastructure related to ILD MDMs, unlike in Australia, for example, although concerns about data security were raised [ 14 ]. This is probably due to the uniform public healthcare system in Finland and good availability of modern health technology and Internet connections regardless of the geographical location of the hospital [ 12 ].…”

“…Health care organizations in Finland are widely digitized, as shown in a previous study [ 12 ]. Less is known about the implementation of eHealth technologies regarding hospitals’ MDM activities.…”

Digital Maturity and Its Measurement of General Practitioners: A Scoping Review

“…In further studies, physicians or general practices were classified into different user or usage categories [42][43][44][45]. Five studies explicitly used the term digital maturity or ehealth maturity and examined these without a separate focus on a single technology for GPs [46][47][48][49][50]. These resulted primarily from national initiatives or government efforts to measure the progress of digitalization in ambulatory care.…”

“…For example, in the Chong et al [38] model, GPs were asked about the maturity of their appointment scheduling system. Other technical aspects included system interoperability [50,54], system stability [56], or privacy and security [46,49]. The technological focus of maturity was represented to varying degrees in the topics surveyed.…”

Milestones and Outcomes in Health and Human Services Informatics Education Programmes

“…Digital services can also help people to follow their health and functional capacity themselves [4]. Information system services have been adopted in healthcare and social welfare across the country and the coverage for EHR usage in hospitals is 100% [2,5]. The national Kanta services are designed to serve both citizens and professionals in healthcare and social welfare.…”