2022
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Estimates of Labiaplasty Performance in the United States From 2016 to 2019

Abstract: The objective of this analysis was to provide national estimates of rates and patterns of labiaplasty performance among all payers in the ambulatory surgery setting. We used the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample database from 2016 to 2019 and estimated the annual rate of labiaplasty in the United States, along with the demographic characteristics of patients undergoing the procedure and characteristics of the facilities where the procedure was performed. The highest rate of cases was observed among adolesce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, recent scholarly discourse has called into question the World Health Organization's definition of FGM/C, which effectively "lumps together"-and disparages as mutilating-all medically unnecessary procedures involving "partial or total removal of external female genitalia or other injury to female genital organs" [22] that are associated primarily with "African" cultures, irrespective of cutting severity or consent. Meanwhile, the WHO does not condemn medically unnecessary genital cutting practices that are normative within "Western" cultures, including some that arguably fall within their definition of "FGM/C" (such as female genital "cosmetic" surgeries) [23,24] and others that are performed on a non-voluntary basis on minors without consent [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recent scholarly discourse has called into question the World Health Organization's definition of FGM/C, which effectively "lumps together"-and disparages as mutilating-all medically unnecessary procedures involving "partial or total removal of external female genitalia or other injury to female genital organs" [22] that are associated primarily with "African" cultures, irrespective of cutting severity or consent. Meanwhile, the WHO does not condemn medically unnecessary genital cutting practices that are normative within "Western" cultures, including some that arguably fall within their definition of "FGM/C" (such as female genital "cosmetic" surgeries) [23,24] and others that are performed on a non-voluntary basis on minors without consent [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in addition to boundary-pushing work on ritual or religious cutting of girls' vulvas (most common in parts of Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and the Middle East, where it is done in conjunction with ritual circumcision of boys in nearly all practicing communities) [31][32][33][34], this collection features critiques of anatomically comparable [35][36][37] vulvar modifications that are more closely associated with Western culture and which are described in that context as being "cosmetic" in nature [38][39][40][41]. These include such modifications as clitoral "unhooding" or other forms of reshaping, vaginal "rejuvenation" procedures, and the more familiar labiaplasty-the last of which is increasingly performed on adolescent girls in parts of Europe, Australasia, and the Americas [42,43].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%