1992
DOI: 10.21236/ada262943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Guard Counterdrug Lessons Learned,

Abstract: This bulletin contains lessons developed from NationaL Guard Counterdrlg Suor. to Law Enforcement Agencies. It includes a section on Counterdrug Irtlte[ Ign; Preparation of the Battlefield (CDIPB). 93-07183 14L SUSIECT TERMS 1S. NUMBER OF PAGES Counterdrug; Military Support to Civil Authorities; Drugs; National Guard; Lessons Learned 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20, LIMITATION OF ABSTPA'C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…90 To a significant degree, the services can take the same approach to improving their ability to conduct interagency operations that they did to improve their capability to undertake joint operations by developing a prescriptive doctrine that emphasizes the techniques and knowledge needed to effectively and efficiently prosecute our national security strategy. 91 Similarly, consensus building is ideal for interagency operations because it facilitates reaching an agreed upon collective course of action by disparate participants.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90 To a significant degree, the services can take the same approach to improving their ability to conduct interagency operations that they did to improve their capability to undertake joint operations by developing a prescriptive doctrine that emphasizes the techniques and knowledge needed to effectively and efficiently prosecute our national security strategy. 91 Similarly, consensus building is ideal for interagency operations because it facilitates reaching an agreed upon collective course of action by disparate participants.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National Guard leaders delegated arming authority to their leaders on the ground. 43 Personality conflicts among senior officials led to a lack of coordination and trust early in the crisis. Sacramento or soldiers in the field, CAANG senior leaders had the impression that their commander-in-chief was indifferent toward them.…”
Section: Los Angeles Riots: a Case Study In Disunity Of Effort "L mentioning
confidence: 99%