National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand

Intarakumnerd, Patarapong; Chairatana, Pun‐Arj; Tangchitpiboon, Tipawan

doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00074-4

Cited by 244 publications

(145 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

143

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Application of the innovation system concept (Freeman, 1995;Lundvall, 1992;Nelson, 1993;Metcalfe, 1995;Edquist, 1997) to developing countries is relatively recent but is increasing rapidly even though there are a number of reasons why this is not straightforward (Arocena and Sutz, 1999;Cassiolato, Lastres and Maciel, 2003;Edquist, 2001;Intarakamnerd, Chairatana and Tangchitpiboon, 2002;Lundvall et al, 2009). …”

Section: Innovation Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries?

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.

show abstract

Section: Innovation Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries?

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In other words, the relationship between academia and industry in developing countries does not show strong linkages, and this has largely been the case until today (Crane, 1977;Waissbluth et al, 1988;Sutz, 2000;Intarakumnerd et al, 2002). Therefore, some scholars (e.g.…”

Section: Academic Research and Entrepreneurial Activities Of Unimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, similar issues, including weak university-industry linkages in developing countries, have only been recently investigated (e.g. Intarakumnerd et al, 2002;Sutz, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of Universities and Government Policy: the case of South Korea

Kwon¹

2015

KTIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigates the two academic revolutions of the Korean higher education system. Since economic catch-up began in the 1960s, Korea has strongly encouraged the activities of its higher education system to serve industrial development as it has progressed through various developmental stages. At the 'strong regulation' stage, universities focused on the provision of technicians. As the need for higher education grew, the 'massive expansion' stage emerged. Finally, most recently, university research and its direct contribution to the economy have been invigorated by strong governmental support. Possibly, this is due to the fact that the Korean government has strongly controlled not only industry but also academia. As long as other East Asian universities have similar conditions to those of the development of Korean universities, we can generalise this model not only to universities in other East Asian countries, but also to universities in other rapid catch-up countries.

show abstract

“…Notably, Miettinen (2002) has criticized the employment of the approach as a policy tool, Carlsson et al (2002) have discussed the problems related to the delineation of innovation systems, since NISs do not develop in isolation but are influenced by other countries and their NISs (Davenport and Bibby 1999), and for example Intarakumnerd, Chairatana, and Tangchitpiboon (2002) have pinpointed some complications inherent in adopting such an approach in the context of developing countries. Additionally, the difficulties related to the empirical validation of the concept and crosscountry comparisons of NISs have been discussed in a range of studies (e.g.…”

Section: Varying Definitions Of National Innovation Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

National innovation system capabilities among leader and follower countries: widening gaps or global convergence?

Makkonen

2014

Innovation and Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of technological catch-up, as it refers to a situation where some less developed countries have been able to catch up to the world leaders in terms of innovation, has inspired an abundant amount of scholarly attention.However, studies comprehensively focusing on factors considered important for innovation in the literature on national innovation systems (NISs) are rare. This gap is addressed here through a systematic analysis of the different dimension of NISs. Despite some positive signs, the global differences are growing i.e. the gaps between the best and the weakest performers are widening. Still, whereas on a global scale convergence is far from being the reality, the analysis was able to indicate a group of countries that have been able to catch-up to the "best in class" countries. Accordingly, there seems to be a clear association between NIS capabilities and the levels of economic development of countries.

show abstract

National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand

Cited by 244 publications

References 11 publications

Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries?

Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries?

Evolution of Universities and Government Policy: the case of South Korea

National innovation system capabilities among leader and follower countries: widening gaps or global convergence?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About