National innovative capacity in East Asia

Hu, Mei; Mathews, John A.

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.04.009

Cited by 289 publications

(162 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

143

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on FP&S framework, Furman and Hayes (2004) investigated the factors that enabled such emerging innovator economies to achieve successful catch-up while some historically more innovative countries experienced relative declines in innovative productivity (1205). Hu and Mathews (2005) extended and modified the FP&S approach by applying it to five "latecomer" countries from East Asia (1373), with their newest work of being "China's National Innovative Capacity" (1977) (Hu and Mathews 2008).…”

Section: Clusters In National Innovation Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis

Sun

Grimes

2015

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Clusters In National Innovation Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis

Sun

Grimes

2015

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The procedure of this approach includes theoretical analysis, mathematical modeling, and econometric test, which is conformed to the research paradigm of mainstream economics. Furman et al (2002Furman et al ( , 2004 [9] [8], Mathews (2005, 2008) [12] [13]also explored the approach. Factors analysis in this approach is supported by both economic theory conomics Discussion Paper and the empirical data, with more reliable results.…”

Section: Quantitative Methods For Analysis Of Nismentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Affecting the Efficiency of the BRICSs' National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study Based on Dea and Panel Data Analysis

Cai

2011

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. (2) In accordance with the NIS approach and the new growth theory, there are many factors that affect the NISs including ICT infrastructure, enterprise R&D, market environment, governance, education systems, economic scale, natural endowments, and external dependence. (3) Enterprise innovation is of particular importance for the NISs. To improve the efficiency of innovation systems, efforts should be made to improve the market conditions, governance, and financial structures, and create a sound environment for R&D. (4) ICT infrastructure, economic scale, and openness affect the diffusion of knowledge and technology, and in turn affect NIS efficiency. (5) The BRICS have low governance levels and a high dependency on natural resources, both of which are determined by their stage of development and extensive growth patterns. To avoid the socalled middle-income trap, the BRICS should transform their factor-driven growth patterns into innovation-driven growth patterns. China still needs to improve its ICT infrastructure, its governance systems, and its education system. During its 12th five-year plan, more effort should be devoted to these fields and to improving external conditions for R&D. Terms of use: Documents inJEL O30, O57, P52

show abstract

“…Furman et al's framework has been widely applied in cross-country innovation studies including technology spillovers in the Chinese high-tech industries, studies of firms' location strategies and knowledge spillover patterns in the United States, the factors of radical innovation across nations, and the national innovative capacity of latecomer countries in East Asia [24][25][26][27]. Many of the variables included in Furman et al's analysis such as R&D personnel, gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) and international patent stocks would probably matter as well for innovations in energy technologies as well as government investment in them.…”

Section: Existing Explanationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy R&D towards Sustainability: A Panel Analysis of Government Budget for Energy R&D in OECD Countries (1974–2012)

Sun

Kim

2017

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Energy transition is one of the greatest challenges for sustainability. However, the overall composition of the world energy supply has not changed much since the late 1970s, with fossil fuels providing 81% of the world's total primary energy supply. While political leaders increasingly call for proactive policies to innovate the energy sector in the face of climate change, governments around the world commit vastly different levels of budgets to energy R&D. This research examines the potential determinants of cross-national variations in government budget allocations for energy R&D with three perspectives. With the panel data analysis of OECD countries , we check the supply-side, demand-side, and institutional factors inducing government investment in R&D for energy in general as well as for renewable energy. Among the multitude of factors tested in our analysis, gross domestic R&D expenditure, refinery output, and the rightist orientation of the governing party show significantly positive influences on government R&D budgets for energy in general. However, refinery output shows the negative effect on government R&D budget for renewables. This contrasting finding about the impact of refinery output on government investment in energy R&D in general vs. renewable energy R&D suggests that policymakers and scholars need to better appreciate the complex roles of the oil sector in driving public R&D investment in energy. It also calls for more proactive renewable energy policy to make progress towards sustainable energy transition.

show abstract

National innovative capacity in East Asia

Cited by 289 publications

References 32 publications

The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis

The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis

Factors Affecting the Efficiency of the BRICSs' National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study Based on Dea and Panel Data Analysis

Energy R&D towards Sustainability: A Panel Analysis of Government Budget for Energy R&D in OECD Countries (1974–2012)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About