2012
DOI: 10.1177/1740774512438980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element Project – approach and methods

Abstract: • Create easily accessible tools for investigators to collect study data. These tools should be especially helpful to new investigators and others working with limited budgets.• Encourage focused and simplified data collection to reduce burden on investigators and practice-based clinicians to facilitate their participation in clinical research.• Improve data quality while controlling cost by providing uniform data descriptions and tools across NINDS-funded clinical studies.The anticipated benefits of the CDE P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
209
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
209
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were collected from these study participants on lifetime and current exposure using a published instrument. 27 The results establish that our intended differences in pesticide exposure between the groups are reflected in their reports of work and living environments. 28 Genetic variability may affect cholinesterase activities, 29 as well as pesticide metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Data were collected from these study participants on lifetime and current exposure using a published instrument. 27 The results establish that our intended differences in pesticide exposure between the groups are reflected in their reports of work and living environments. 28 Genetic variability may affect cholinesterase activities, 29 as well as pesticide metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The Common Data Element (CDE) project began in 2005 as part of an initiative by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) to assist NINDS-funded investigators in the collection of neuroscientific clinical trial research data in a standardized and consistent fashion (Grinnon et al 2012). The CDEs are content standards that can be applied to various data collection models and are intended to be dynamic and evolve over time, as indicated by research advances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goals of the NINDS CDE Project are to: 1) Disseminate standards for data collection from participants enrolled in neurological disease studies; 2) Create easily accessible tools for investigators to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64collect study data. These tools should be especially helpful to new investigators and others working with limited budgets; 3) Encourage focused and simplified data collection to reduce burden on investigators and practice-based clinicians to facilitate their participation in clinical research; 4) Improve data quality while controlling cost by providing uniform data descriptions and tools across NINDS-funded clinical studies (Grinnon et al 2012). As the CDEs were being developed, the number of clinical trials for patients with mitochondrial disease also rose, highlighting the value and urgency of such tools to be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure was based on items selected from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (http://www.commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov/PD.aspx#tab=Data_Standards). 18 Participants were asked about 13 residential and occupational pesticide exposures (e.g., residence located within ¼ mile of farm fields, different types of pesticides used in residence, employment as pesticide applicator, employment in farming and other pesticide-exposing industries) for up to 7 age periods (0 to 17 years, 18 to 25 years, 26 to 35 years, 36 to 45 years, 46 to 55 years, 56 to 65 years, 66 years or older). The positive responses were given a value of 1 and were summed, providing a measure with the values 0 to 13 for each age period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%