Free Time and Leisure Participation: International Perspectives 2005
DOI: 10.1079/9780851996202.0283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National leisure participation and time-use surveys: a future.

Abstract: The contributors to this book were asked to provide information in relation to their respective countries on: (i) national leisure participation and time-use surveys that have been conducted; (ii) overall patterns of leisure participation and leisure time use arising from the surveys, including, where possible, trends over time; (iii) inequalities in patterns of participation in relation to such factors as gender, age, and socioeconomic status; and (iv) the effects of globalization on leisure behaviour, includ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these conditions, the scope for comparison is limited. A similar problem (in terms of cross-time and cross-national comparisons) could apply to many other databases if the data had not been subjected to appropriate adjustments, as is the case with MTUS data; or if it was not based on a harmonized methodology, such as that developed for HETUS (Cushman et al, 2005;Eurostat, 2004aEurostat, , 2004bEurostat, , 2009Freeman et al, 2005;Ö sterberg and Baigorri, 1999;United Nations, 2004).…”
Section: Differences In Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions, the scope for comparison is limited. A similar problem (in terms of cross-time and cross-national comparisons) could apply to many other databases if the data had not been subjected to appropriate adjustments, as is the case with MTUS data; or if it was not based on a harmonized methodology, such as that developed for HETUS (Cushman et al, 2005;Eurostat, 2004aEurostat, , 2004bEurostat, , 2009Freeman et al, 2005;Ö sterberg and Baigorri, 1999;United Nations, 2004).…”
Section: Differences In Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Veblen's (1 925) work on conspicuous consumption or, as it is termed today, 'merit goods', has great relevance in supposedly 'classless' societies, and is consistent with the work of contemporary economists. The concept of time too, can usefully be explored by leisure researchers (e.g., international comparisons of the use of time using time-budget diaries (Cushman, Veal, Zuzanek, 2005) as well as by economists (e.g., Linder, 1970). At the risk of contradicting our earlier arguments, we also agree with promoting an enhanced focus on the interconnections between leisure and the wider so-A RESPONSE TO RE-FRAMING QUESTI 0NS: ASSESSI NG THE SI GNI FI CANCE OF LEISURE ciety.…”
Section: Encouraging Inter-collegial Work and Enhancing (Theoreticallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale leisure participation and time-use surveys are conducted, on a regular or one-off basis, at the behest of governments or government agencies in most developed countries, for their own policy-related purposes (Cushman et al 2006), and are typically designed and conducted by government statistical agencies, such as the Australian Bureau of Statistics, or by contracted commercial polling companies.…”
Section: Large-scale Leisure Participation and Time-use Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Participation' means engaging in an activity at least once in the year prior to interview. This is far from being a wholly satisfactory measure of participation, for a variety of reasons (see Cushman et al 2006), but it is the main measure used in official reports, and the one measure which can be used to compare data from different surveys, as is done here. The overall participation rate, which refers to participation at least once in the past year in at least one of the 170 activities covered, shows men with a participation rate of 79.6%, which is only 0.5% more than women's participation rate of 79.1%.…”
Section: Table 5 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%