2006
DOI: 10.1108/02621710610678526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National level intentional change: a story of two countries

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop an insight, through an examination of the American Civil Rights Movement and the Anti‐Apartheid Movement in South Africa, into how desired change occurs at a national or cultural level of social organization.Design/methodology/approachThe words and actions of two key figures in these national change movements are analyzed through the use of intentional change theory, and its constituent elements of discontinuous change, reference groups, the ideal self and emotion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smith (2006) examines ICT at the level of formation and development of social capital. Howard and Coombe (2006) examine ICT at the country or culture level (all in this issue). But a primary feature of a complex system is that there is an interaction among the levels and that interaction produces adaptive or emergent behavior.…”
Section: The Fourth Discovery: Metamorphosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Smith (2006) examines ICT at the level of formation and development of social capital. Howard and Coombe (2006) examine ICT at the country or culture level (all in this issue). But a primary feature of a complex system is that there is an interaction among the levels and that interaction produces adaptive or emergent behavior.…”
Section: The Fourth Discovery: Metamorphosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith (2006) examines ICT at the level of formation and development of social capital. Howard and Coombe (2006) examine ICT at the country or culture level (all in this issue).…”
Section: Fractals and Interaction Among The Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches described by the leaders suggest that leading change requires a focus on both hard systems and soft system changes, which is thus consistent with theories propounding the value of both these approaches in leading change (Nohria & Beer, 2000). The leaders’ accounts also provide insight into how radical national change influences the leadership of change in organizations (Howard & Coombe, 2006). All the leaders articulated and conveyed a vision for the changes they wanted to institute in their organizations, but also implemented changes in systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the type of change South African organizations confronted in 1994. Theorists suggest this type of change is more likely to occur when organizational structures and patterns of behaviour have become entrenched (Howard & Coombe, 2006; Street & Gallupe, 2009). This was the case in South Africa on both a national level and an organizational level, since the apartheid system was omnipotent and institutionalized in both government and organizational policies, practices, processes, and structures (Mangaliso & Nkomo, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is a multilevel theory, ICT also describes SDC at other levels (Boyatzis, 2008), such as dyads (Boyatzis, Smith, & Beveridge, 2013), teams (Boyatzis, 2010), organizations (Boyatzis, Smith, Van Oosten, & Woolford, 2013; Van Oosten, 2006), communities, and countries (Howard & Coombe, 2006). Boyatzis (2008) has described this as follows:Sustainable change within a family, team or small group occurs through the cyclical “group level definition”of the five discoveries.…”
Section: Intentional Change Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%