Purpose -Change, and in particular intentional or desired change, has not been understood nor systematically studied. By applying concepts from complexity theory to intentional change theory, the purpose of this paper is to provide a new level of insight into why and how sustainable desired change can occur at all levels of human/social interaction, from individual to teams to organizations to communities, countries and the globe. Design/methodology/approach -Using research from over 30 years of longitudinal studies of individual and organizational change, the concepts are explored and implications proposed. Findings -Sustainable, intentional change is on the whole discontinuous. It occurs through a series of five discoveries or emergence conditions. It is driven by the interplay of the positive and negative emotional attractor. It follows the described process at all fractals of human organization.Research limitations/implications -Extensive empirical research has been done at the individual level, but only case studies at the organization and country levels. Practical implications -Every person seeking to explore, understand, or facilitate sustainable, desired change can be helped by the model and understanding how it functions. Originality/value -The theory of intentional change is relatively new to the literature, as is the use of complexity theory.Keywords Change management, Complexity theory, Individual development
Paper type Conceptual paperFor all of the time, effort, and money invested in attempts to help individuals develop through education, training, and coaching, there are few theories that help us to understand the change process. Other than Prochaska et al. (1992) and McClelland (1965), the actual process of change is left like a mysterious black box. Theories or models of how teams, organizations, communities, countries or even global change occur are more frequent but are often a post hoc description of how the consultants or change agents went about the process. As a result they lack the depth and utility of sound theory. Each new framework has the potential of being a new "change fad", but seldom are they put to the empirical test of demonstrating sustainable results.One of the reasons for this paucity of good theory is that the underlying paradigm on which they are conceptualized is lacking in credibility. The idea of smooth, continuous change does not fit with the reality most of us experience. In this paper and this entire Special Issue of this journal, we will describe a theory of change that has produced demonstrable results at the individual level, and, we believe, explains change at other levels of human and social organization. We also go on to explain that it requires the use of complexity theory to understand the process of change. Once concepts from complexity theory are applied, it then becomes a distinct possibility that this theory of change helps to explain sustainable change at all levels of human and social organization.The current issue and full text archive of this j...