2022
DOI: 10.2471/blt.21.286852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National policy responses to maintain essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large proportion of the plans found and included in this review were published early in the pandemic: 75% of the CPRPs we identified were published between January and April 2020, and 78% between January and June 2020. The lack of publicly available updates to national plans was also observed by PATH’s COVID-19 Essential Health Services Policy Tracker 27. Our findings demonstrate the importance that global guidelines not only integrate essential health service provision from the first publication, but that this integration considers specificities of services including MNCAAH, sexual and reproductive health, nutrition and non-communicable diseases (NCDs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large proportion of the plans found and included in this review were published early in the pandemic: 75% of the CPRPs we identified were published between January and April 2020, and 78% between January and June 2020. The lack of publicly available updates to national plans was also observed by PATH’s COVID-19 Essential Health Services Policy Tracker 27. Our findings demonstrate the importance that global guidelines not only integrate essential health service provision from the first publication, but that this integration considers specificities of services including MNCAAH, sexual and reproductive health, nutrition and non-communicable diseases (NCDs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Earlier reviews have suggested that national plans and policies published until the later months of 2020 had limitations in their consideration of essential health services alongside immediate COVID-19 response to stop the pandemic,26 27 their overall processes to prioritise scarce healthcare resources28–30 or their consideration of the needs of specific populations 31 32…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Containment policies or closures might be necessary to reduce infection, but they should be combined with other policies to promote essential health service utilization. Policies to promote essential health services during times of crisis should be expansive and extend beyond just maternal and child health [ 44 ]. Several service adaptations to maintain essential non-COVID healthcare have been implemented in the studied countries and have included the use of telemedicine, community outreach and innovations for medicine delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the Ethiopian health system was significantly affected in the early months of the pandemic, as were health systems in many countries [ 1 ]. Service provision shifted dramatically to accommodate the need for COVID-19 treatment and prevention efforts, at times at the expense of essential SRH services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COVID-19 pandemic has led to disruption, illness, and death around the world. As is common in times of crisis, the pandemic's consequences have been experienced most acutely by those who already experience marginalization, exacerbating existing social and economic inequities [1]. In low-resource settings, the pandemic has contributed further strain to health systems already stretched thin, drawing resources away from often underfunded and neglected issues, such as sexual and reproductive health (SRH) [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%