2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2016.7730430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National satellite image coverage using overall planning technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In aerial panoramas, image acquisition can be performed by satellites or UAV systems, but satellite technology provides a higher coverage area than that of other systems such as UAVs [23]. One advantage is that satellite image acquisition is faster than that of UAVs [24]. However, there are important factors to evaluate for the use of satellite image acquisition: firstly, if an analysis of a specific section is required, it is necessary to check if any satellite is available for the specific coordinates or has recent information on the area of interest; additionally, if the area is small, when zooming to focus on it, the resolution will be lower in comparison to that of a medium-size UAV camera; an additional consideration is UAVs' dependence on the state of the clouds, owing to the fact that satellites are not subjected to weather inclemency, such as storms, as UAVs are; for satellite aerial panorama, the methods for mosaicing images are based on cross-correlation, Fourier-based, phase correlation, and area-based approaches [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aerial panoramas, image acquisition can be performed by satellites or UAV systems, but satellite technology provides a higher coverage area than that of other systems such as UAVs [23]. One advantage is that satellite image acquisition is faster than that of UAVs [24]. However, there are important factors to evaluate for the use of satellite image acquisition: firstly, if an analysis of a specific section is required, it is necessary to check if any satellite is available for the specific coordinates or has recent information on the area of interest; additionally, if the area is small, when zooming to focus on it, the resolution will be lower in comparison to that of a medium-size UAV camera; an additional consideration is UAVs' dependence on the state of the clouds, owing to the fact that satellites are not subjected to weather inclemency, such as storms, as UAVs are; for satellite aerial panorama, the methods for mosaicing images are based on cross-correlation, Fourier-based, phase correlation, and area-based approaches [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Long et al [17] designed an improved multi-satellite cooperative task planning algorithm (MSCTP-CEM) based on a co-evolution mechanism. Zhang et al [18] introduced an overall planning technique to solve the problem of earth satellite schedule. In contrast, Kilic and Ozkan [19] proposed an ant colony optimization metaheuristic approach to solve the broadcast's scheduling problem.…”
Section: Research On Ground Stations Scheduling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With involvement of local surveying and mapping departments across the country, the land cover mapping was achieved by the basic workflow of 1) base map production, 2) remote sensing data collection and processing, 3) field survey and verification, and 4) GCC data set construction. Finally, and importantly, since the geographic conditions might experience change during the census period, the GCC data set was checked and approved to the standard time point June 30, 2015, which means that the census data reflect the land cover status around June 30, 2015 [30].…”
Section: Geographic Conditions Census Datamentioning
confidence: 99%