2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National scale spatiotemporal land-use regression model for PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 concentration in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Organization and Chinese authorities 31 . With the acceleration of economic and industrial development, air pollution will most likely be an inevitable issue, particularly in the developing countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organization and Chinese authorities 31 . With the acceleration of economic and industrial development, air pollution will most likely be an inevitable issue, particularly in the developing countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional studies have explored the correlation between PM 2.5 concentration and land-use distribution by using a land-use regression model (LUR). Zhang et al (2018) explored and analyzed the relationship between land use and PM 2.5 concentration in China based on ground monitoring data and spatial econometric models and showed that the construction land and road length in the 1-km buffer were positively correlated with the PM 2.5 concentration, while the grassland area and forest area in the buffer zone were negatively correlated with the PM 2.5 concentration [ 13 ]. Yang et al (2017) analyzed the impact of land-use distribution on PM 2.5 in Nanchang city using a linear regression model and proved that land-use distribution had a significant effect on PM 2.5 concentration.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After detailed review, few studies were found to have evaluated the economic value of the air that we breathe (Table 1). Here, we employed the value of the provisioning of clean air as the avoided cost of reducing the air pollution (mainly refers to particulate matter, defined as PM2.5 [21]), that is, $0.018 m 3 •person −1 •day −1 as the unit value of air that we breathe. 3.2.…”
Section: Atmospheric Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%