2012
DOI: 10.1785/0120110170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand: 2010 Update

Abstract: A team of earthquake geologists, seismologists, and engineering seismologists has collectively produced an update of the national probabilistic seismic hazard (PSH) model for New Zealand (National Seismic Hazard Model, or NSHM). The new NSHM supersedes the earlier NSHM published in 2002 and used as the hazard basis for the New Zealand Loadings Standard and numerous other end-user applications. The new NSHM incorporates a fault source model that has been updated with over 200 new onshore and offshore fault sour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
304
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
9
304
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anderson and Luco 1983;Youngs and Coppersmith 1985;Frankel et al 2002;Stirling et al 2002;Field et al 2009;Stirling et al 2012) we opted for the original contribution proposed by Anderson and Luco (1983), which generates activity rates that conform to a double-truncated Gutenberg-Richter distribution (Anderson and Luco 1983;Youngs and Coppersmith 1985;Bungum 2007).…”
Section: Fault Sources and Background (Fsbg) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anderson and Luco 1983;Youngs and Coppersmith 1985;Frankel et al 2002;Stirling et al 2002;Field et al 2009;Stirling et al 2012) we opted for the original contribution proposed by Anderson and Luco (1983), which generates activity rates that conform to a double-truncated Gutenberg-Richter distribution (Anderson and Luco 1983;Youngs and Coppersmith 1985;Bungum 2007).…”
Section: Fault Sources and Background (Fsbg) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Seismic Hazard Model of New Zealand (Stirling et al 2012) has recently been updated. In this update, conditional probability of rupture of the Wairarapa Fault, Ō hariu Fault and WellingtonÁHutt Valley segment of (Table 1), under the exponential, lognormal, Weibull and inverse Gaussian recurrenceÁtime distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these active faults Á the Wairarapa Fault and the Ō hariu Fault Á pose a significant risk to life, property and societal infrastructure. In fact, perceived earthquake hazard and loss in the Wellington region is dominated by these two faults, along with the WellingtonÁHutt Valley segment of the Wellington Fault, at return periods greater than a few hundred years (Smith & Harmsen 2010;Stirling et al 2012). Accordingly, the conditional probability of rupture of the Wairarapa Fault and the Ō hariu Fault is a matter of great importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic rupture sources are defined by the current NZ ERF of Stirling et al [14]. Although not required in general, seismic hazard analyses were first performed using empirical GMPEs to identify the 100 earthquake ruptures which contribute most significantly to the seismic hazard (the ERF of Stirling et al [14] contains ruptures from over 500 fault and 20,000 distributed seismicity sources, the majority of which pose negligible hazard at the site). For each of these !…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%