2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National surveillance of 2,3,7,8-substituted polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/furans in soil in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suggested that the PCDD/Fs came from the industrial process as the maximum WHO-TEQ value from background site soil was only 1.24 pg WHO-TEQ/g dw compared to industrial areas soil which had maximum WHO-TEQ values of 1.73 to 3.98 pg WHO-TEQ/g dw. Results from Hsu et al (2018) revealed that the average total PCDD/Fs for contaminated sites and background sites was 14.0 ± 19 pg WHO-TEQ/g and 6.25 ± 17.5 pg WHO-TEQ /g, respectively, hence the suggestion that dioxins are produced by industrial process. Pandelova et al's (2018) study presented generally higher PCDD/Fs content compared to mineral topsoil.…”
Section: Sources Of Dioxins In Related Samplesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is suggested that the PCDD/Fs came from the industrial process as the maximum WHO-TEQ value from background site soil was only 1.24 pg WHO-TEQ/g dw compared to industrial areas soil which had maximum WHO-TEQ values of 1.73 to 3.98 pg WHO-TEQ/g dw. Results from Hsu et al (2018) revealed that the average total PCDD/Fs for contaminated sites and background sites was 14.0 ± 19 pg WHO-TEQ/g and 6.25 ± 17.5 pg WHO-TEQ /g, respectively, hence the suggestion that dioxins are produced by industrial process. Pandelova et al's (2018) study presented generally higher PCDD/Fs content compared to mineral topsoil.…”
Section: Sources Of Dioxins In Related Samplesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the provincial level, the distribution of I-TEQ concentrations across provinces also shows a high degree of spatial heterogeneity (ANOVA: F = 4.04, p < 0.001), which is mainly attributed to the influence of the provincial economic development level, population density and industrialization degree (Figure 2c); by averaging the I-TEQ concentrations of all sample points in certain province) [47,[49][50][51]. For example, Inner Mongolia, Qinghai and Hainan, with lower levels of economic development (accounting for 1.71%, 0.30% and 0.55% of the national GDP in 2020, respectively), population density (1850.42, 2929.52 and 2444.40 people/km 2 , respectively) and added value of secondary industry (6868.00, 1143.50 and 1055.30 billion yuan, respectively), have the lowest average dioxin concentrations: 0.25, 0.30 and 0.51 ng I-TEQ/kg, respectively.…”
Section: Baseline Concentration Level Of Dioxinsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results show a significant heterogeneity in the spatial distribution pattern for dioxin concentrations in soils (ANOVA: F = 10.31, p < 0.001). The reason for this might lie in the higher industrialization degree and intensive dioxins emission sources (e.g., cement production, MSW incineration and steel industry) in the eastern region, which results in the increase in dioxin concentrations in soils through atmospheric deposition [46][47][48].…”
Section: Baseline Concentration Level Of Dioxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%