The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought 2003
DOI: 10.1017/chol9780521563543.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nationalism and imperialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the anarchical nature of this interstate system and the changing dynamics of hegemony and polycentrism have been discussed at length, it was only very late that a counter-trend calling for the study of connections forged by nonstate institutions emerged (Nye) or that scholars began to wonder why the global political system emerged as an international one (Mayall, 1990). While the anarchical nature of this interstate system and the changing dynamics of hegemony and polycentrism have been discussed at length, it was only very late that a counter-trend calling for the study of connections forged by nonstate institutions emerged (Nye) or that scholars began to wonder why the global political system emerged as an international one (Mayall, 1990).…”
Section: The Three Variants Of Methodologiczal Nationalism Within Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the anarchical nature of this interstate system and the changing dynamics of hegemony and polycentrism have been discussed at length, it was only very late that a counter-trend calling for the study of connections forged by nonstate institutions emerged (Nye) or that scholars began to wonder why the global political system emerged as an international one (Mayall, 1990). While the anarchical nature of this interstate system and the changing dynamics of hegemony and polycentrism have been discussed at length, it was only very late that a counter-trend calling for the study of connections forged by nonstate institutions emerged (Nye) or that scholars began to wonder why the global political system emerged as an international one (Mayall, 1990).…”
Section: The Three Variants Of Methodologiczal Nationalism Within Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…International relations assumed that nation-states are the adequate entities for studying the world. While the anarchical nature of this interstate system and the changing dynamics of hegemony and polycentrism have been discussed at length, it was only very late that a counter-trend calling for the study of connections forged by nonstate institutions emerged (Nye) or that scholars began to wonder why the global political system emerged as an international one (Mayall, 1990). Similarly, post World War I1 scholarship on the newly independent states approached nation building as a necessary, although somewhat messy aspect of the decolonization process (see, e.g., Wallerstein, 1961).…”
Section: The Three Variants Of Methodologiczal Nationalism Within Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that the plurality to encompass has become more diverse due to the global expansion of international society, the main challenges to state pluralism seem to have emerged in the West due to nationalism and the commitment to universal human rights. While nationalism like state pluralism opposes cosmopolitanism and empire, nationalism challenges state pluralism through secessionism and irredentism (Mayall, 1989; Miller, 2000: 176–177). The notion of individual human rights challenges the priority of the state and hence state pluralism.…”
Section: Solidarismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por tudo isso, é inevitável que os temas da identidade nacional e do nacionalismo se entrecruzem, até porque a maior polêmica relaciona-se com a existência de visões mais extremistas. Proeminentes estudiosos sobre nacionalismo, como Smith (1979), Calhoun (1993) e Mayall (1993), sublinharam a necessidade da sua compreensão para a paz, domando os seus excessos, verificada a persistência de um sistema mundial baseado em estados, apesar de todas as organizações supranacionais, e dado não ter ainda aparecido uma lealdade humana mais forte ou um princípio legitimador da organização política do Estado moderno capazes de transcender o ideal nacional.…”
Section: Identidade Cultural: Em Torno Do Valor E Do Sentidounclassified