Nationalistic Education and Indoctrination

Abstract

The Guidelines on Civic Education in School (1996) for Hong Kong recommend that there should be five foci in school civic education, namely education for democracy, human rights education, education for the rule of law, nationalistic education and global education. After the return of sovereignty of to the People's Republic of China in 1997, Hong Kong became the Hong Kong Special Administration Region (HKSAR) and the SAR government has singled out nationalistic education as the sole focus of civic education. This paper is a report of cases studies focusing on the understanding and practice of nationalistic education of three civic educators whose understanding is inclined towards education for totalitarian nationalism in Hong Kong secondary schools, using the concepts of indoctrination. The findings show that because of the teachers' inability to separate the nation from the ruling party and their strong mission of sending a positive image of the party to their students, they have tended to adopt particular teaching strategies, which might suppress the students' ability to reflect critically. According to the criteria of indoctrination, namely relationship, intention, content and teaching method, their teaching approaches tend to be indoctrinatory, rather than educational. This is certainly unacceptable to those who believe education is concerned with the development of independent, critically thinking individuals. Hopefully, this paper will enhance the awareness of the potential indoctrinatory nature of nationalistic education of teachers and shed light on the development of school-based nationalistic education aiming at the cultivation of the 'critical patriot'.

Digital nationalism: How do the Chinese diplomats and digital public view “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy?

“…Some scholars show the top-down aspect of Chinese nationalism (e.g., Zhao, 1998;Leung, 2004;He, 2007;Du, 2013), while other scholars show the bottom-up aspect of nationalism (e.g., Liu, 2006;Yang & Zheng, 2012;Ma, 2015;Fang & Repnikova, 2018;Blanchette, 2019). Nonetheless, the construction of nationalism in China is the product of both top-down and bottom-up forces.…”

Using experiential learning of NGOs to enhance active citizenship education in school curriculum

“…The British colonial government also aimed at fostering passive, obedient and law-abiding citizens who could support the status quo (Bray and Lee, 1993), while the Director of the Education Department was given power to control schools’ curriculum, textbooks and activities (Morris and Chan, 1997). The debate around Hong Kong’s civic education changed from the depoliticisation to the politicisation of civic education after the change of sovereignty in 1997, with the introduction of nationalistic education to Hong Kong schools (Leung, 2004). Some local people and Chinese officials also pressed for more nationalistic education because of the perception that Hong Kong citizens were alienated from China, and that their national identity was very weak after 150 years of colonial rule (Lee, 1999).…”

“As far as the government is a good government, it is democratic”: Citizenship education in China

“…Substance democracy, from its literal understanding, we can sense it more underscore material rather than democracy, but it reflects a disposition of Chinese with the government. Leung’s (2004: 116–130) research shows that the particularity of human rights, especially the right to enough food to eat in order to live as the most essential human right in China and only the CCP can feed the 1.4 billion Chinese people. And he says, Notwithstanding its many deficiencies, the Chinese government has ensured the world’s fastest growing economy and vastly improved living standards for most people.…”