2018
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nationwide Analysis of Treatment Patterns for Korean Breast Cancer Survivors Using National Health Insurance Service Data

Abstract: BackgroundThe National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) established a healthcare claim database for all Korean citizens. This study aimed to analyze the NHIS data and investigate the patterns of breast cancer treatments.MethodsWe constructed a retrospective female breast cancer cohort by analyzing annual incident cases. The annual number of newly diagnosed female breast cancer was compared between the NHIS data and Korea National Cancer Incidence Database (KNCIDB). The annual treatment patterns including surger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database (KNCIDB) is a hospital-based cancer registry system that has the stages of cancer. However, the overall cancer prevalence rates using the two data are quite similar in the previous studies, and this study suggests that NHIS data are a feasible data source for cancer survivorship [50,51]. Second, operationally defined CVD may be incorrectly coded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…On the other hand, the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database (KNCIDB) is a hospital-based cancer registry system that has the stages of cancer. However, the overall cancer prevalence rates using the two data are quite similar in the previous studies, and this study suggests that NHIS data are a feasible data source for cancer survivorship [50,51]. Second, operationally defined CVD may be incorrectly coded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Because we considered the first 2 years (2005‐2006) as a washout period to exclude prevalent breast cancer cases, subjects were excluded from the cohort if they had already been coded as C50 from 2005 to 2006 . The operational definition is similar to a previous algorithm that we reported in previous studies . Patients were excluded from the cohort if they had already been diagnosed with CHF between 2005 and 2006 (to exclude prevalent CHF cases) or if they had been newly diagnosed with CHF within the 2 years after their breast cancer diagnosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The operational definition is similar to a previous algorithm that we reported in previous studies. 14 Patients were excluded from the cohort if they had already been diagnosed with CHF between 2005 and 2006 (to exclude prevalent CHF cases) or if they had been newly diagnosed with CHF within the 2 years after their breast cancer diagnosis. Male subjects, patients younger than 20 years, and patients who did not undergo breast cancer surgery were also excluded from this study.…”
Section: Data Source and Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations