2015
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nationwide study of publication misrepresentation in applicants to residency

Abstract: This study documents the nationwide prevalence of publication misrepresentation amongst applicants to Canadian otolaryngology residency programmes. The high rate of misrepresentation aligns with data reported in the literature and highlights the need to institute measures to dissuade graduates from this form of unprofessional behaviour.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, falsification of self-reported research activity, termed publication misrepresentation, has been reported in several studies of both Canadian and US candidates applying to surgical and non-surgical residency programs. [39][40][41] The degree to which misrepresentation occurred in our sample could not be determined but has been reported to be as high as one quarter of applicants to a single surgical subspecialty. 40…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, falsification of self-reported research activity, termed publication misrepresentation, has been reported in several studies of both Canadian and US candidates applying to surgical and non-surgical residency programs. [39][40][41] The degree to which misrepresentation occurred in our sample could not be determined but has been reported to be as high as one quarter of applicants to a single surgical subspecialty. 40…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“… 39 41 The degree to which misrepresentation occurred in our sample could not be determined but has been reported to be as high as one quarter of applicants to a single surgical subspecialty. 40 …”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were startling, revealing misrepresentation and sometimes complete fabrication of articles, with rates ranging from 5 to 45% [41][42][43]. It is of no surprise that commentary on these findings mentioned the competitiveness of these specialties as partial explanations for the transgressions, with similar findings from a Canadian study published in 2015 [44]. It is long overdue for UK specialty training applications to be analysed in a similar manner.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Research Misconduct and Medical Spementioning
confidence: 74%
“…This expectation also appears to be motivating increasing numbers of students to take research years during medical school [ 12 ]. It is also likely underlying the significant rates of publication misrepresentation found in residency applications across various specialties [ 13 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be inferred from the increasing numbers of medical students taking research years, with the most common reason being to ‘increase competitiveness for residency application’ [ 12 ]. In addition, significant rates of publication misrepresentation exist on applications across specialties [ 13 16 ], behaviour that has also caught the attention of the media [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%