2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.155202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native point defects and doping inZnGeN2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion would also hold for similar cation-disordered systems such as ZnSnP 2 [22,23] and ZnGeN 2 [24] if the local charge neutrality is preserved. It is also notable that defects and impurities that show low formation energies simultaneously with deep levels do not exist when the Fermi level is located within the band gap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This conclusion would also hold for similar cation-disordered systems such as ZnSnP 2 [22,23] and ZnGeN 2 [24] if the local charge neutrality is preserved. It is also notable that defects and impurities that show low formation energies simultaneously with deep levels do not exist when the Fermi level is located within the band gap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Compared to the corresponding diagram in ref. , the changes are that only Ge 3 N 4 limits the stability region since Zn 3 N 2 is now found to have positive energy of formation, and the fact that Ge 3 N 4 has less negative energy of formation and thus allows for a more Zn‐poor limit, indicated here by point C and a more Zn‐rich limit, point A. The former is especially important for the samples grown by the methods of ref.…”
Section: Stability Versus Competing Binariesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The point defects in ZnGeN 2 were reported in two of our previous papers, the first one addressing vacancies and antisites, while the second one addressed interstitials. Since then, one other study has been reported by Adamski et al Here we compare the results of the two studies and update some of our results in view of the updated chemical potential diagram discussed in the previous section.…”
Section: Point Defectsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations