2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natriuretic Peptide Assays Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NT-proBNP immunoassays may be improved by antibodies detecting glycosylated or non-glycosylated NT-proBNP and antibodies detecting NT-proBNP not affected by glycosylation ( Rosjo et al, 2015 ). In current proBNP immunoassays, glycosylated proBNP cross-reacts more than non-glycosylated proBNP with BNP and NT-proBNP ( Emdin et al, 2011 ). There are inter-individual differences in NT-proBNP and proBNP glycosylation in patients with and without HF ( Saenger et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Analytical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NT-proBNP immunoassays may be improved by antibodies detecting glycosylated or non-glycosylated NT-proBNP and antibodies detecting NT-proBNP not affected by glycosylation ( Rosjo et al, 2015 ). In current proBNP immunoassays, glycosylated proBNP cross-reacts more than non-glycosylated proBNP with BNP and NT-proBNP ( Emdin et al, 2011 ). There are inter-individual differences in NT-proBNP and proBNP glycosylation in patients with and without HF ( Saenger et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Analytical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANP and BNP [23-26]. Clerico and co-workers concluded that the large differences in these results are most likely due to the specificity of monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies used, the design of immunoassay system (competitive vs. non-competitive assay), the analytical matrix (serum vs. EDTA vs. heparinized plasma) used, and the plethora of circulating forms of natriuretic peptides, as previously reported for ANP and BNP immunoassays [23,26,27]. These methodological sources of bias may also be conceivable for CNP and NT-proCNP assays and thus explain the great difference in results in the cited studies (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In these patients, this combined measurement was particularly promising in patients with low levels of BNP, in which the clinicians could be falsely reassured. Clinical evaluation of combinations of highly specific assays for the assessment of BNP peptides are still needed [14] especially in patients with chronic renal failure since the half-life of the 3 peptides and/or their respective renal clearance is poorly understood [15]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%