2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural and anthropogenic correlates of habitat use by wild ungulates in Shuklaphanta National Park, Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas muntjac and wild pig occurred at more sites than sambar and gaur in Thailand (Phumanee et al, 2020), gaur and pig were the least and most wide-ranging species in Karnataka Western Ghats landscape (Karanth, 2016). Contrastingly, Lamichhane et al (2020) found that barking deer had lowest site occupancy in comparison to other species in Shuklaphanta National Park, Nepal. Hence, there exists much variation in ungulate occupancy patterns in regards to body size, perhaps influenced by local habitat, environmental factors and anthropogenic pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Whereas muntjac and wild pig occurred at more sites than sambar and gaur in Thailand (Phumanee et al, 2020), gaur and pig were the least and most wide-ranging species in Karnataka Western Ghats landscape (Karanth, 2016). Contrastingly, Lamichhane et al (2020) found that barking deer had lowest site occupancy in comparison to other species in Shuklaphanta National Park, Nepal. Hence, there exists much variation in ungulate occupancy patterns in regards to body size, perhaps influenced by local habitat, environmental factors and anthropogenic pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The spatial dependence is captured by parameters θ, representing the probability that the species is present locally, given the species was not present in the previous segment; θ′ representing the probability that a species is present locally, given it was present in the previous segment, and θ π representing the probability of local presence in the first segment where no prior information on local occupancy is available. Bias due to autocorrelation between adjacent observations can be considered negligible when model selection by AIC (at the level of ΔAIC<2) favours the null model over the spatial autocorrelation model and θ′ ≈ θ (Thorn et al 2011;McHenry et al 2016;Lamichhane et al 2020). We applied this model to the sets of standard detection histories for each segment length to test for betweensegment spatial dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variable is an alternative measure of prolonged disturbance faced by Ripu RF in the last two decades, including cattle grazing, hunting, and all kinds of resource extraction (majorly fuel wood) (Gray and Phan 2011). In contrast, distance to water sources is expected to positively impact elephant habitat use (Lakshminarayanan et al 2016) and the abundance of wild ungulates (Lamichhane et al 2020). Subsequently, the proportion of different vegetation types (SE-MMD, SDF and SC) may influence the habitat use of animals.…”
Section: Selection Of Ecological and Anthropogenic Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations