2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural dynamics of temperate mountain beech-dominated primary forests in Central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a higher probability of finding old trees on plots with a lower maximum severity of plot-level disturbance, or where the maximum severity event occurred further back in time. These findings are not at all surprising given that both the beech-and spruce-dominated primary forests studied here experience a disturbance regime characterized by relatively frequent moderate-severity, partial canopy disturbances that are likely to remove susceptible individuals (i.e., large, old trees) in the canopy layer (Nagel et al, 2014;Čada et al, 2020;Frankovič et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was a higher probability of finding old trees on plots with a lower maximum severity of plot-level disturbance, or where the maximum severity event occurred further back in time. These findings are not at all surprising given that both the beech-and spruce-dominated primary forests studied here experience a disturbance regime characterized by relatively frequent moderate-severity, partial canopy disturbances that are likely to remove susceptible individuals (i.e., large, old trees) in the canopy layer (Nagel et al, 2014;Čada et al, 2020;Frankovič et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Radial growth patterns of increment cores were analyzed for evidence of past disturbance events within each plot. Quantitative reconstructions of disturbance histories for different regions of the larger data set used here have been published previously (Standovár & Kenderes, 2003;Svoboda et al, 2014;Trotsiuk et al, 2014;Janda et al, 2017;Meigs et al, 2017;Nagel et al, 2017;Schurman et al, 2018;Janda et al, 2019;Schurman, Babst, Björklund, et al, 2019;Čada et al, 2020;Frankovič et al, 2020), and provide detailed descriptions of dendroecological methods. We therefore only briefly summarize the methods used to reconstruct disturbance below.…”
Section: For Spruce)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compiled data from, (1) long‐term studies of primary and old‐growth forests (please refer to Sabatini et al, 2018 for definitions), (2) dendrochronological studies, and (3) other studies defining the ranges of variability in disturbance dynamics for the four forest categories (Appendix S3, Table 2). To define the attributes of natural disturbances at landscape scale, the experts used information from studies investigating many of the largest and most intact old‐growth forests remaining in Europe, including Perućica forest reserve in Bosnia‐Herzegovina (Nagel et al, 2014), primary forests in northern Finland (Aakala, 2018), unmanaged boreal forests in Fennoskandinavia including Russian Karelia (Kuuluvainen & Aakala, 2011), old‐growth forests of the Carpathians (Keeton et al 2010, Čada et al, 2020; Frankovič et al, 2021), the Parangalitsa Reserve in Bulgaria (Panayotov et al, 2011), and forest reserves in the European Russia (Aakala et al, 2011; Ryzhkova et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, different types of definitions were proposed across the United States and beyond. Wirth et al, 2009;Frankovič et al, 2021) • Time since the last stand-replacing natural disturbance exceeds the maximum longevity of the dominant tree species (Mosseler et al, 2003) • Forests that developed in a lack/absence of human disturbance (Er and Innes, 2003;Helms, 2004;Nagel et al, 2013;Barton and Keeton, 2018).…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 99%