Volume 1: 37th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1115/detc2017-67555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Finger Interaction for CAD Assembly Modeling

Abstract: In current CAD software the process of assembly modeling is hindered by a large number of separate rotation and translation actions necessary, especially in case of larger assemblies. Additionally matching faces, edges or points must be selected by clicking to define the appropriate constraint. In contrast to that, the process of assembling two normal sized physical parts in the real world seems to be rather simple. That is because we know how to grasp and move objects with our hands intuitively from our every… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementing the detection algorithms into the mouse and keyboard operated desktop environment would not be reasonable. Again, the small p values and the high effect sizes for the evaluable samples indicate small probabilities of error and strong effects (Cohen 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implementing the detection algorithms into the mouse and keyboard operated desktop environment would not be reasonable. Again, the small p values and the high effect sizes for the evaluable samples indicate small probabilities of error and strong effects (Cohen 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These are approximate values which may vary depending on the characteristics of the task (e.g., object size, distance and rotation angle). The very small p values and the high effect sizes (> 0.8) for the evaluable samples indicate small probabilities of error and strong effects (Cohen 1988). Outliers in the virtual environment can occur if finger tracking problems appear or the user inadvertently pushes objects out of their current range (e.g., toward the floor plane).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extended reality (XR) interfaces, which are all interfaces using virtual, mixed, or augmented reality, can extend the functionalities of CAD software. Advantages of XR-CAD interfaces can range from easier access for inexperienced users, faster interactions, improved size perception to simply a more compelling experience [1][2][3].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They created a custom framework combining Leap Motion SDK, Oculus SDK, Nvidia PhysiX, Open Scene Graph, and Ansys SpaceClaim to prototype and evaluate their developed interactions [5]. First assembly modeling was implemented [2] and recently design sketch creation was explored [6].…”
Section: Cad In Xrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Esser et al, 2016) Interaction with components in VR enables intuitive handling, e.g. for assembling processes (Fechter and Wartzack, 2017). Thus, the designer can get intuitive access to various mechanical components, which is particularly advantageous for design modifications.…”
Section: Exemplary Use Of Virtual Reality In the Product Development mentioning
confidence: 99%