Humidity and light were the most dominant ecological factor for silviculture in the ecosystems presented by Ashton and Hall (this volume) and Fredericken (this volume). However, several other factors can also shape structure and function of forest ecosystems and hence have great impact on the corresponding silvicultural potential. At the example of mountain forests and mangroves, basic similarities and differences of forest ecosystems at ecological margins and their silvicultural potential are highlighted in this paper. As simliar to other ecosystems at ecological margins, mangroves and montane forests are of extraordinary importance for the provision of environmental services or are characterized by a relatively high proportion of endangered species. In turn, they are frequently highly endangered by human pressure and global change, converting them into high priority areas for conservation aspects. At ecological margins growth conditions are frequently poor, individual tree dimensions and timber yields are low. Forest management, based on timber alone can therefore hardly compete with alternative land use forms, which finally leads to conversion into agricultural land and deforestation. Even more than in other ecosystems, payments for environmental services, REDDplus-mechanisms, the use of non-wood forest products, or a combination of all these approaches may help to increase the economic attractivity for sustainable forest management and thus allow to combine conservation aspects with additional income for rural population.
IntroductionManifold ecological factors can shape structure and dynamic and ecosystem functions of forest ecosystems: for example, temperature, salinity, nutrient availability and many others, but it is impossible to cover all tropical forest formations which can be formed by a combination of these factors in this book. While the chapter "humid