SPE Eastern Regional Meeting 1977
DOI: 10.2118/6629-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Gas Production From Coal Seams

Abstract: The estimated 4 trillion tons of coal which lie buried beneath the U.S. at depths of less than 3,000 feet are thought to contain nearly 300 trillion cubic feet of pipeline-quality natural gas. The mechanism by which this gas is released is believed to result from the diffusion of adsorbed gas through the microporous bulk matrix into the natural fractures where mass transport is governed by the principles of Darcy flow. This two-step process may ultimately be controlled by conditions of critical flow, or choke … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But the most credible and reliable method to obtain gas content is still obtained by the direct method. After the direct method was put forward in 1970, the decline curve method and the Smith and Williams method were proposed and developed. In addition, the GRI method, polynomial method, and the Amoco method , have been applied to different degrees. It is worth noting that the direct method using early desorption data to estimate lost gas will lead to the decline of calculation accuracy, and the Amoco method using full desorption data for fitting calculation may get more accurate results. ,, At present, the most widely applied mean to predict coal gas content is the direct method, especially in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the most credible and reliable method to obtain gas content is still obtained by the direct method. After the direct method was put forward in 1970, the decline curve method and the Smith and Williams method were proposed and developed. In addition, the GRI method, polynomial method, and the Amoco method , have been applied to different degrees. It is worth noting that the direct method using early desorption data to estimate lost gas will lead to the decline of calculation accuracy, and the Amoco method using full desorption data for fitting calculation may get more accurate results. ,, At present, the most widely applied mean to predict coal gas content is the direct method, especially in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los trabajadores en las minas estaban expuestos diariamente a gases que eran peligrosos para su salud (Chase, 1977), de aquí nacen los primeros estudios. El principal objetivo fue la desgasificación de éstas, previniendo posibles explosiones.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified