2013
DOI: 10.1177/0142723713499848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural gender, phonological cues and the default grammatical gender in French children

Abstract: According to a dominant thesis, nominal endings are the privileged cues French children use to determine new nouns' gender subclass. Children will rely on phonology even in cases of discordance with natural gender. Two elicited production studies involving more than 250 4-to 17-year-olds showed that while French children did not base their gender attribution choices on natural gender, they did not base them on phonology either: the masculine was the dominant choice. These results thus provide additional suppor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent studies by Boloh and his colleagues (Boloh and Ibernon, 2010, 2013; Boloh, Escudier, Royer and Ibernon, 2012) found no evidence that French children or adults use a phonological strategy when selecting a gender-marked determiner for inanimate pseudo-nouns in an elicited production task. When 4- to 10-year-old children performed the same task with incongruent determiner-noun pairs of inanimate pseudo-nouns, they never relied on phonological cues, leading Boloh et al (2012) to conclude that children use the masculine as a default gender, and that the feminine is acquired based on its co-occurrence with feminine determiners.…”
Section: Review Of Selected L1 French Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recent studies by Boloh and his colleagues (Boloh and Ibernon, 2010, 2013; Boloh, Escudier, Royer and Ibernon, 2012) found no evidence that French children or adults use a phonological strategy when selecting a gender-marked determiner for inanimate pseudo-nouns in an elicited production task. When 4- to 10-year-old children performed the same task with incongruent determiner-noun pairs of inanimate pseudo-nouns, they never relied on phonological cues, leading Boloh et al (2012) to conclude that children use the masculine as a default gender, and that the feminine is acquired based on its co-occurrence with feminine determiners.…”
Section: Review Of Selected L1 French Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When 4- to 10-year-old children performed the same task with incongruent determiner-noun pairs of inanimate pseudo-nouns, they never relied on phonological cues, leading Boloh et al (2012) to conclude that children use the masculine as a default gender, and that the feminine is acquired based on its co-occurrence with feminine determiners. Boloh and Ibernon (2013) administered an oral description task with pseudo-words to children (n=182) of various age groups (from 3;8 to 12;6), adolescents (n=24) and young adults (n=22), and similarly report no evidence of a phonological strategy.…”
Section: Review Of Selected L1 French Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be sensitive to that similarity, children must have developed an abstract representation of a passive construction (Nicoladis and Sajeev, 2020). Another study found that children who spoke a highly inflected L1 acquired inflections in L2 English faster than children who spoke an L1 with few inflections (Blom et al, 2012). Children can only benefit from the existence of inflections in L1 when learning L2 English if they have some abstract representation of inflections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspects of morphosyntax present particular challenges in some languages, with studies by Rodina and Westergaard (2013), Boloh and Ibernon (2013) and Blom, Polisenska, and Weerman (2008) demonstrating a protracted trajectory of acquisition of grammatical gender in Norwegian, French and Dutch respectively. Rodina and Westergaard (2013) showed evidence of considerable delay in the acquisition of gender agreement in Norwegian, a language with an opaque grammatical gender system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%